Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Thorne

The crimes are alleged to have happened 1974-1978. How would anyone go about proving this now? Is proof no longer necessary?


3 posted on 08/06/2021 10:24:55 AM PDT by Iowa Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Iowa Slim

And once the accusation is made, how could the case be defended? No witnesses, no memories, few records.... Statutes of limitation exist for a reason but were eliminated in these cases for political reasons. A cash cow for the plaintiffs bar, especially when the defendant is a known scoundrel like McCarrick. Of course, it is the Church’s own fault for harboring and facilitating so many homosexuals. Yet, it is not the “Church” who pays but the generations of believers whose donations funded the assets that will pay the settlements. Meanwhile, Pope Francis fiddles.


4 posted on 08/06/2021 11:16:46 AM PDT by Stingray51 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Iowa Slim; ebb tide

A Catholic priest is presumed guilty. Look at Cardinal Pell, Bishop Nienstedt, Bishop Finn... all innocent, all scapegoated and persecuted.


5 posted on 08/06/2021 11:21:59 AM PDT by Marchmain (TLM refugee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson