I agree however as the article said
“The pastor met us in the meeting room and started talking about gender identification, and that they teach the words of the lord, and that marriage is between a man and a woman,’ Emily said, ‘And that they didn’t think this was a good fit.’
Emily said she was initially insulted, but also embarrassed.
‘We’ve never been confronted so bluntly about our relationship,’ she said. ‘Our love, our marriage, has always felt natural. Our families have always made us feel like we are two people who love each other. This was a big slap in the face.’ “
Now you just know what these two would do if their kid when there. They would turn around and sue the school for “hate speech” when, not if the school started teaching the girl that her two mommies are going to hell for their sins.
Best to avoid the lawsuit, these two are troublemakers. The article said other “Christian” schools would take them which means probably the Episcopagan one having drag queen story hour in the chapel.
So why did they send the kid to a Christian school?
That sounds good for the kid.
Did they think they were ‘Christians’?
So when the kid gets marriage between a man and woman, and comes home with it . . .
What happens?
They ain’t true Christians. They’re woke libiots.
>> Best to avoid the lawsuit, these two are troublemakers
Good point, but that concern could be mitigated with a contract.
Sounds like these two women, heretofore, have been surrounded by enablers. Seriously...an enabler is not your friend.
‘We’ve never been confronted so bluntly about our relationship,’ she said... This was a big slap in the face.’
............................
Imagine the greater shock when she hears, “Depart from me, I never knew you.”
It's about bloody time somebody did, then, you filthy disgusting queer.
‘Our love, our marriage, has always felt natural.
ROFL!!! Your lust and your grotesque mockery of marriage is utterly unnatural.
This was a big slap in the face.’
And well deserved. Maybe it will wake you up.