[crz]

“Davis violated their constitutional right to marry”

Ya? And where is that in the constitution?

[quikstrike98]

Here’s the good news, it looks like this New York judge’s ruling legalizing polygamy will likely make its way to the Supreme Court. And looky here, just earlier this year, Clarence Thomas said the Court needed to reexamine Obergefell.
The dissenters on the Court said this would happen when they decided to make gay marriage a “right”.

[daniel1212]

"“Davis violated their constitutional right to marry” Ya? And where is that in the constitution?" It is not, but Roberts and a majority read it into the Constitution, thus making it unconstitutional for states to deny it, as well as for anyone to discriminate against any who fall under this disposition and behavior-based classification. Next up, those who claim a disposition toward mating with animals (consent presumed) and or consuming human flesh (under prior consent of the consumed) can be a protected class, and be favored above other candidates for enrollment or employment under affirmative action. Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling. (Psalms 2:10-11)