According to Francis, looking back to Vatican II, 60 years ago, would also be looking “back.”
If what he says is true, that Vatican II continues what was taught from 30 AD until 1968, then what “backwardism” is he talking about?
If Vatican II does not continue but deviates what was taught from 30 AD - through all of the popes, infallible decrees, Councils (Nicea to Trent), etc - then it is a new religion.
*deviates from
It is a new (false) religion.