Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: adorno

“it might as well also be split geographically into constitutional states and progressive-communist states.”

My point is that the progressive-communists would never allow that. They would go to war before they accepting coexistence with a constitutional state. In their brains, ‘constitutional’ means racist/sexist/homophobe/deplorable basket of MAGA and in their brain they possess the moral high ground. It would be another ‘war of northern aggression’ against the ‘war against racism’ or some other naked hyperbole. and based on their current success rate I’m pretty certain that would not go the way you or I hope it does.


7 posted on 04/14/2023 5:41:02 AM PDT by Samurai_Jack (This is not about hypocrisy, this is about hierarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Samurai_Jack
My point is that the progressive-communists would never allow that.

My point is that, it's impossible to coexist with the enemy. The enemy is within, and if THEY don't want to comply and commit to the constitution and the bill-of-rights and common law, then, they are the ones that need to begone from the union. It's not up to the communists and progressives to decide for the rest of the country that is willing to abide by the constitution. They want different rules from what our founders gave us, then, we can't live with them.

What the blue states fear is that, they won't be able to make it without the rest of America, since, they would soon turn into poverty-ridden states, like Somalia and Venezuela and Cuba and N. Korea, N. Vietnam. There is no way that they can succeed without conservative and republicans and libertarians.
9 posted on 04/14/2023 4:56:35 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson