Posted on 03/04/2024 7:19:42 AM PST by ebb tide
This essay by Fr. Joachim Heimerl was originally published in French on the blog of Italian journalist Marco Tosatti. It has been translated and reprinted by LifeSiteNews with the permission of Marco Tosatti.
(LifeSiteNews) — An increasing number of voices in the pope’s circle are saying it: celibacy is to become a victim of the “Franciscan” Church reform.
Yet celibacy, in particular, is an interesting indicator, because wherever it is called into question, the Catholic faith has evaporated. Those who distance themselves from Christ always distance themselves first from the way of life that HE lived. This applies to every pope, every bishop, and every priest. Seen in this light, the betrayal of celibacy is nothing less than a new betrayal by Judas, and not even the Vatican seems to shy away from finally committing this betrayal.
The pope’s heralds are already preparing it: One high-ranking prelate after another speaks out against celibacy and hopes to receive 30 pieces of silver from Francis in return.
READ: Pro-LGBT Vatican official opposes mandatory celibacy: ‘Why should I lose a priest to marriage?’
Cardinal Alfons Maria Stickler (1910-2007), librarian and archivist of the Holy Roman Church, described such tendencies as early as 1993. In his book The Case for Clerical Celibacy, he emphasizes that celibacy was never just an ecclesiastical law that could simply be abolished. On the contrary: the abstinence of the clergy dates back to the Apostles and was expected of all clergy in the early Church. If they were married, they were no longer allowed to have sexual relations with their wives after ordination. The cardinal traces this practice back to 1 Corinthians 9 and refers to the corresponding resolutions of the Councils of Tours (461), Gerona (517), and Auvergne (535). He makes it clear that celibacy is more than a rigorous practice; it is about Christ and the priesthood of the New Covenant.
In other words, it is all or nothing. Where faith in Christ dies, abstinence dies first. And where heresies and schisms arise, the abolition of celibacy always appears as a harbinger, as was the case with the introduction of the Protestant Schism in Germany and England.
Seen in this light, celibacy is an indicator of faithfulness to Christ, and that is why the Church has always held on to it. Of course, this is also due to the fact that celibacy refers to the innermost essence of the priesthood: The priest is united to Christ in a sacramental and ontological way. This is precisely why the priesthood is never limited to an external function. It is not a “profession” like any other but a sacred vocation – and it demands the whole man and an undivided heart. Being a priest is not a half-measure or a part-time job, and those who do not sacrifice themselves can never perform the sacrifice of Christ at the altar. Cardinal Stickler calls this the “ongoing sacrificial life” of the priest, which is, of course, as little understood today as the sacrificial character of the Holy Mass.
READ: Cardinal Sarah’s beautiful defense of priestly celibacy must be read
The Levitical priesthood of the Old Covenant, which involved cultic abstinence limited only to the time of the service in the temple, is surpassed in its essence by this New Testament priesthood. This again becomes visible in celibacy, of which Cardinal Stickler writes that it is much more than just an “appropriate way of life” for priests. Instead, it is necessary and indispensable; it connects the Church with Christ through the Apostles.
The fact that only the Catholic Church has preserved this connection truly distinguishes it as “Catholic and Apostolic”; one could say that celibacy is its trademark and the holy seal of Christ.
If the pope were to abolish celibacy, he would, therefore, be acting against the Apostles and Christ. And even if married men (so-called “viri probati”) were to be ordained to the priesthood, it could only be done if they committed themselves to the marital abstinence the early Church demanded.
Today, however, people no longer want to hear about this because they no longer know Christ. Without a deeper knowledge of Christ and without the sacrifice of total devotion to HIM, no one can be a priest. Cardinal Stickler points this out in contrast to the mainstream that has taken hold of the reformers around Pope Francis. His book makes it shockingly clear how far the Church has distanced itself from Christ.
If the pope were to abolish celibacy, this would mark its definitive downfall – and expose his reform program for what it is: an unprecedented work of destruction.
READ: Austrian priest: Pope Francis’ fight against the Latin Mass is ‘a fight against the Church’
Correction: A previous version of the headline referred to Fr. Heimerl as a “German priest,” but he is actually Austrian. We regret the error.
Ping
By abolishing mandatory celibacy, decent, rational priests will be eventually able to rid the clergy of perverted homosexuals. Disbanding the homosexual dominated Jesuit order would also do the Church much good.
Many of the Eastern Catholic Churches, which are in full communion with the Pope, allow married men to be priests.
Horse-hockey.
30 years ago, I asked the priest who did our marriage preparation about this. He said that, with all he does as a priest, it would be hard to give time to a wife and children. It would also be harder on a parish’s finances to pay a priest enough to support them. A Franciscan friend once remarked that it wouldn’t be against Church doctrine to change this, and there have been exceptions, such as Anglican priests who convert. Still I think that it’s wise as a general rule.
Sorry but it is best to recognize how the homosexual permetation of the Catholic clergy and hierarchy has severely weakened the moral credibility of the Church and has alienated many of the once faithful. Its not a good situation. Heterosexual behavior is inherent in normal men. Mandatory celibacy keeps them out of the priesthood and is a perfect guise for perverts.
Horse-hockey
You are spot on.
The Apostle Paul recognized this problem when he wrote:
But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion. 1 Cor. 7:9 NIV
“God made them man and woman, and trying to fudge the lines is what is destroying our culture right now.”
Sexual determination is exactly what you said. If you substitute being taught different and fudge the lines you have the exact same meaning. But fudging the lines by being taught different is exactly what I said. So how is what you said and what I said a lie?
wy69
I am not sure how hard this is, but if there was no teaching about sexuality at all, girls would still be girls and doing girl things, and boys would still be boys and doing boy things. The very idea of teaching sexuality to young children is grooming.
We didn’t play any of those games in my house, no tv and very few movies. The boys and girls played the same for a few years, but at a certain point the girls liked one thing and the boys liked other things. Heterosexual behaviour is the “CREATED” norm and the other stuff is taught.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.