Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Creepy
1 posted on 03/15/2024 2:29:38 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Morgana
Apologies in advance for being abstruse.

There's a very big element to erotic love that is related to the "forbidden." I don't think that is what God has in mind.

One might even go so far as to say that the desire for erotic love cuts to the very core of our fallenness.

There are drugs that produce the same or very similar neuro-chemical effect as erotica and erotic sex. The hunger that such drugs elicit is powerful to the point of being addictive (just ask Hunter Biden). I have known men and women who are overwhelmed by the need to feed that hunger.

This seems to be one of the hallmarks of human fallenness (that is, the obsessive need to satisfy a hunger that is opposed to obedience to God).

2 posted on 03/15/2024 3:02:30 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (A person who seeks the truth with a closed mind will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Wow that’s just weird and wrong


3 posted on 03/15/2024 3:04:39 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

I am starting to wonder if John Piper is a closet homosexual.?.?


6 posted on 03/15/2024 4:09:35 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Many Christian mystics, like John of theCross and Theresa of Avila speak about God’s love in much this way.


9 posted on 03/15/2024 5:38:18 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Not a fan of Piper.


10 posted on 03/15/2024 6:08:57 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

If Jesus were born today the Dems would crucify him in the manger.


12 posted on 03/15/2024 6:25:10 AM PDT by bray (You can tell who the Commies fear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
In defense of John Piper

I read John Piper’s book - “Desiring God” and it had a profound impact on my relationship with my Heavenly Father. As a child listening to the Baptist preacher literally loudly rant & rave about sin and going to hell, scared me. I answered the altar call and professed my belief, but to be honest, it was more from fear of hell than what I would find nearly 20 years later as a deep love for the Lord because of His gift of Grace to me even though I am a sinner.

My prayers to Him were full of praise, thankfulness, confessions, and requests. But I still didn’t feel really “close to Him.” I knew that something was missing in my walk with Him because I was doing all the above as a duty, an obligation to be obedient. Yes, I felt confident that I was “saved”, but I yearned for more and prayed for the Holy Spirit to open my eyes to what I was missing.

Fast-forward to 2016. I was building the website for the PCA Church I had joined in our new hometown. They wanted a link to the Westminster Shorter Catechism, and I noticed :

Q. 1. What is the chief end of man?
A. Man’s chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever.

It was like a light popping on! …. “to enjoy him” …. WOW! Looking for a book to read about how to “enjoy him”, I found Piper’s book. Not the end of my story…. A glorious new beginning. Now I look for ways to “glorify God”, not from a sense of duty but because it makes me gloriously happy. Other things also make me happy, my husband, Grandchildren, my garden, playing music, but nothing compares with Joy in the Lord! Talking to Him all through the day, He is part of all decisions, orders all my steps, a constant companion, protector.

Today I am reading that John Piper is evil and creepy. In defense I submit the following for you to consider.

There is no author’s name on the article but I suspect it comes from the organization of E.S. Williams, a Doctor in the UK who has multiple blogs and articles with the same criticisms expressed in this article. I am wondering if he is much like the Baptist preacher from my childhood…. Boastfully spouting orthodoxy and without understanding the context of some misunderstood words he narrowly defines that cause his audience (like today) to cringe. There are many well known Christians who praise Piper’s books.

Please consider the following comments in his defense that I have gathered:

In defense of the term "Christian hedonism" from Piper’s book Desiring God: Meditations of a Christian Hedonist:
1. The term "hedonism" means "a living for pleasure". If the chief end of man is to enjoy God forever, then we should live our lives for pleasure -- the pleasure of knowing God.
2. The term does not refer to a single, pagan philosophy but is a generic term that has been applied to a wide variety of philosophies that elevate the pursuit of pleasure. For the Christian hedonist, it includes the idea of pursuing the greatest pleasure, not in the short term, but maximized over eternity.
3. Many wise, old Christians have chosen to describe the Christian life in these terms. C. S. Lewis and Soren Kierkegaard are among them.
4. The term has a jolting effect. This is appropriate for a philosophy that has a life-changing effect on its adherents. Furthermore, this philosophy can be extremely threatening to nominal adherents of Christianity, since it focuses on the motives of the heart rather than superficial actions.
5. Although the word definitely has a pagan connotation in most circumstances, Scripture itself uses words with normally negative connotations to teach positive truth. For instance, Jesus compared himself to a thief in the night. He also commended the shrewdness of an unrighteous steward. Surely, a word that is in essence quite neutral can be used to express the truth that we should find our highest delight in God!
6. Finally, the word "Christian" as a modifier of the term "hedonism" signals loud and clear that this is no ordinary hedonism. It is controlled and defined by the Christian revelation, the Bible. Only by submitting ourselves to the authority of Scripture can we know what is everlastingly most pleasing.

Christian Hedonism is a vision of life and ministry based on the truth that God is most glorified in us when we are most satisfied in him.

The Westminster Shorter Catechism summarizes the "chief end of man" as "to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever." Piper has suggested that this would be more correct as "to glorify God by enjoying Him forever."

Christian hedonism was developed in opposition to the deontology of Immanuel Kant, who argued that actions should be considered praiseworthy only if they do not proceed from the actor's desires or expected benefit, but rather from a sense of duty. On the contrary, Christian hedonists advocate for a consequentialist ethic based on an understanding that their greatest possible happiness can be found in God.

Some Christians object to Christian Hedonism's controversial name. It has little commonality with philosophical hedonism; however, Piper has stated that a provocative term is "appropriate for a philosophy that has a life changing effect on its adherents." Critics charge that hedonism of any sort puts something (namely, pleasure) before God, which allegedly breaks the first of the Ten Commandments: "You shall have no other gods before me." In response, Piper states on his website that:
“By Christian Hedonism, we do not mean that our happiness is the highest good. We mean that pursuing the highest good will always result in our greatest happiness in the end. We should pursue this happiness, and pursue it with all our might. The desire to be happy is a proper motive for every good deed, and if you abandon the pursuit of your own joy, you cannot love man or please God.

Scripture commands us to find delight in God: “Delight yourself . . . in the Lord” (Psalm 37:4). Over and over, the Bible speaks of the rewards of obedience (Luke 12:33; Hebrews 11:6), great gain (Philippians 3:8; 1 Timothy 6:6), and joy (John 15:11; Nehemiah 8:10).

In Hebrews 11, Moses is said to have refused “the passing pleasures of sin,” choosing instead “the reproach of Christ” (verses 24–25). Why? “He looked to the reward” (verse 26). Moses, therefore, was a true Christian hedonist. He sought the eternal reward that only God can give, spurning this world’s counterfeit—and temporary—pleasures. In so doing, Moses achieved the most fulfilling happiness—in God. And God was glorified.

14 posted on 03/15/2024 10:53:08 AM PDT by Apple Pan Dowdy (... as American as Apple Pie. Normal is not coming back, but Jesus will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson