Your vaunted reasoning has failed you, O. God also defined the penalty for sin. By your reasoning above, God would be "subject" to this penalty (particularly since OWK has declared him guilty of the sins of theft and murder.) That would mean that God would be eternally separated from the presence of . . . God. How silly. How silly indeed.... but the difference between you and I, is that you look at this paradox, and say God must be subject to a different set of rules, which are beyond our understanding....
I on the other hand, look at this paradox, and say that God could not possibly exist as described in the Bible.
There is no paradox. Your reasoning is faulty. You've refused to accept God's conditions and definitions, and then you've made your own set instead.
Your assumptions are false and therefore your conclusions are in error.