Now, there is nothing in your answers that refutes what he says, or the article. Mormon view on the Trinity is clearly different from Orthodox Christian doctrine, but you already knew that.
Refute ... that is a debate word. In one post I was going to the Bible for information on the nature of God (rather than to creeds or early fathers) and pointing out that homoousion, one Being or substance, is not taught there, quite the opposite. In the other post I was picking up on your view of the importance of authority from God, and adding a big Amen, talking about our teaching, and Bible teaching, about authority from God, its vital importance, and the blessings that come from having it on the earth in our day. Of course, those who do not receive it cannot be benefitted by it.
I do suggest we stick to the Word of God. You were suggesting that the Bible is too sketchy and needs to be filled in, and to me that shows the need, God willing, for a restoration of the Holy Apostleship and the inspiration, the correct understanding of the Scripture we have, and the additional Scripture that comes with that holy calling.
>> Mormon view on the Trinity is clearly different from Orthodox Christian doctrine, but you already knew that.
Now, should I let you have the phrase "Orthodox Christian" to define as you wish? Would the Eastern or Greek or Russian Orthodox be happy with that? Having true and living apostles of Jesus Christ at the head of the Church makes us the orthodox Christians, obviously!