Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does God force you to believe or can you resist? Irresistible Grace -- Not a Bible Teaching.
http://www.zianet.com/maxey/Tulip6.htm ^ | Al Maxey

Posted on 07/25/2002 7:23:40 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-582 next last
To: xzins
***The bottom line is that "resistible grace" is a bible teaching. Resistible grace is absolutely incompatible with calvin's "unconditional election." It is totally compatible with the bible's "conditional election." ***

-- Pope Xzins, ex cathedra

21 posted on 07/26/2002 6:15:38 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Come down for a cup of coffee when you are in Shreveport if you can. It would be fun to discuss theology or whatever face to face.

Steve
22 posted on 07/26/2002 6:18:01 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Come down for a cup of coffee when you are in Shreveport if you can. It would be fun to discuss theology or whatever face to face. Steve

I had thought about trying to catch you sermonize if schedule permitted. Are you always in the pulpit or do you rotate with other/others?

23 posted on 07/26/2002 6:23:45 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
***The bottom line is that "resistible grace" is a bible teaching. Resistible grace is absolutely incompatible with calvin's "unconditional election." It is totally compatible with the bible's "conditional election." *** -- Pope Xzins, ex cathedra

nope, brother xzins, ex biblia.

Kindness, DrJ, you're 'sposed to have a :-) after those kinds of posts.

24 posted on 07/26/2002 6:26:16 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I guess my question is if the grace that saves is truly resistible is it really grace?
25 posted on 07/26/2002 7:31:21 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Kindness, DrJ, you're 'sposed to have a :-) after those kinds of posts.

A belated :-) and a few for pennance

:-) :-)
:-) :-)
:-) :-)
:-) :-)
:-) :-)


26 posted on 07/26/2002 7:46:48 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
Well, if I offer you a hundred dollar bill, and you turn it down, is it still a hundred dollar bill?
27 posted on 07/26/2002 8:54:28 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
now are those extra :-)'s sufficient for all, or effective for actual need?
28 posted on 07/26/2002 8:57:52 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: xzins
***now are those extra :-)'s sufficient for all, or effective for actual need? ***

Great line.
29 posted on 07/26/2002 9:31:35 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xzins
You are clever but you are confusing the offer with the gift. Hence, your analogy fails because you are assuming that salvation is not applied until the gift is accepted.

In fact, regeneration is applied by God's Spirit prior to the offer of salvation. That grace makes the individual able and willing to believe or accept the offer. Romans teaches that by nature no one seeketh after God. By nature, no one wants to be saved. Hence, no one can accept the offer of salvation unless they are regenerated and made willing to accept the offer. A salvation that can be accepted or rejected by a sinner is a salvation that is earned. This is so because it is predicated on the autonomous ability to accept the offer. Grace that is earned thereby is not grace.

A dollar bill that is rejected is still a dollar bill bill. But grace that is earned is not grace. If there was something in the person that gave them the power to accept the offer, then salvation would be predicated on the inherent ability to accept that offer. Salvation would be based on something meritorious in the individual. Hence, the gift would no longer be of grace.

You raise a curious and clever argument. Unfortunately, you are slipping dangerously into pelagianism. Be careful my friend.

30 posted on 07/26/2002 10:13:04 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Still waiting for an answer to this xzins

To: RnMomof7

He paid the price for all, but it is only effective for those who accept the free gift. Some don't accept the gift, so they are lost. That is what I teach. If He paid the price for all men how can God make some men pay again for the sin that is already paid for? That is my question to you X


Let me say it again another way, Rn. The amount paid was more than enough to pay for everyone if everyone decided to accept the gift. None would have been turned away for lack of funds.

The price was effective only for those who received the free gift.


IN about 76/77 President Carter declared a provisional amnesty for MILITARY RESISTERS of the Vietnam War. The amnesty applied to every military resister. However, of the thousands eligible, only about 5000 actually applied.

That left the non-applicants legally liable for prosecution. If left those who had accepted the amnesty, free and clear and able to resume their lives as full American citizens.

You're old enough to be part of the Vietnam generation. You probably remember this event.

285 posted on 7/25/02 11:44 PM Eastern by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]


To: xzins

Let me say it again another way, Rn. The amount paid was more than enough to pay for everyone if everyone decided to accept the gift. None would have been turned away for lack of funds.

So Jesus did not REALLY save anyone with His blood on the cross then..he simply deposited his blood in the Blood bank in case it would ever be wanted? It was not finished then?

286 posted on 7/25/02 11:58 PM Eastern by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
31 posted on 07/26/2002 3:13:49 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Well, if I offer you a hundred dollar bill, and you turn it down, is it still a hundred dollar bill?

Irrevelent ...Jesus gave that 100 dollar bill to the banker for your debt...it was marked paid in full...

So will the JUST God demand to burn in hell for an unpaid bill that his son already paid?

32 posted on 07/26/2002 3:16:13 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Don'tMessWithTexas
You seem like a fair person. As one guy said the other day, "We'll get together in heaven and chuckle over some of our earthly misunderstandings of doctrine." Then we'll know fully even as we are fully known.

There are lots of folks that think they have saved themselves..to them Jesus says

Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

33 posted on 07/26/2002 3:20:14 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xzins
but there is another calling, which is referred to here. It always wins....The point is simply this: when God sets out to save some one of the elect, He so works on his heart that he successfully overcomes all resistance. He irresistablly and efficaciously draws the sinner to Christ. It never fails....Irresistable Grace is simply the comination of electing grace and omnipotence. (The History and thelogy of Calvinism, Daniel, p.379-80)
And it is this point that is wrong. It is wrong scripturally.

Would you point me to your "God is my co pilot" scripture?

34 posted on 07/26/2002 3:27:48 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
To finish the analogy: If God offers grace to Mr Y, and Mr Y turns it down, it is still grace.

Your post assumes the philosophical argument that guides calvinism and then uses it to justify irresistible grace.

The above post presents the bible information on times when grace has been resisted and then builds a doctrine.

35 posted on 07/26/2002 3:57:25 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Don'tMessWithTexas
To finish the analogy: If God offers grace to Mr Y, and Mr Y turns it down, it is still grace.

So the cross accomplished nothing? It was only a bid on your soul? ...Going once going twice...oppps withdrawn from the auction?

I thought the debt was paid at the cross..do you have scripture to say it was not?

36 posted on 07/26/2002 5:45:12 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I have been wanting to give you a more complete response. This is not as well researched as I would like, but I think it provides a foundation of sorts.

This evening our family read Psalm 11. In that Psalm, God is described as having eyes and eyelids. Other scriptures refer to the arms or hands of God. John 4 clearly teaches that God is a spirit and hence does not have a body like men. Which is true? There is an apparent contradiction. But we know that the Bible is consistent.

You read and cite scripture that supports what appears to be a teaching that God's grace can be resisted. However, we must interpret those verses you cite in light of other verses. You mention individuals rejected God and would have appeared to have successfully rejected his grace.

In Romans 9, Paul specifically deals with the issue of God's sovereignty in salvation. In v. 14 Paul says, "Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid." v. 15 ...but I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I ill have compassion. So then it is not of him that willeth of him that runneth, but of God who shows mercy." In other words, one cannot become a child of God relying on the strength of their will.

v.18 "Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy and whom he will hardeneth." Wait a minute. My...you mean God actually hardens the hearts of men? And he has compassion only on those whom he wills? Yes. As a result some men will reject God, just as Pharoah actually rejected the pleas of Moses and Aaron. But who actually hardened his heart? Check Exodus and you will find that God did. And hence, we touch one of the greatest of mysteries. God hardens the heart of men, yet those men still remain absolutely responsible for his sin. Conversely, all those whom God has chosen will be saved. Romans 8:30 says "For whom he did predestinate, them he also called (called through the preaching of the gospel):and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified." There is no hint here that anyone chosen by God will be able to successfully resist Him.

Let's also look at John 6:37 and 39. "All that the Father hath given me shall come to me; and him that cometh unto me I will in no wise cast out." "And this is the father's will which he hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day."

The scripture says that all that the Father hath given unto the Son in the covenant of redemption will effectually come unto the Son. That leaves no room for being able to successfully resist the grace of God. All those given unto the Son in the predestinating grace of God, will ultimately come unto the Son. This is reinforced in v. 39 when the Lord states that of all that the Father hath given unto the Son, he would lose nothing. No room for being able to successfully resist the grace of God.

The only remaining question is whether those who are not predestinated actually receive a full free and unfettered offer of Christ in the gospel. That is a very difficult question, but the answer is yes. They receive a genuine offer but they are unwilling to receive that offer due to the fact that they are dead in their sins. And they are dead in their sins due to their own depravity and sinfulness. They only difference between the saved and the unsaved person is that God in his mercy willed that one would be a vessel of honor and the other a vessel of dishonor. The vessel of dishonor, however, has no claim of unrighteousness against God. Romans 9:20: Shall the thing formed say unto him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? v.21: Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel of honor and another unto dishonor. All this is that he might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy which he hath prepared unto glory. v. 23.

Therefore, the elect person will never be able to resist the will of God. The non-elect God has no compassion on, he actually hardens his heart as he rejects God. And in the end that condemned soul has no complaint against God for making him the way he is because God is absolutely sovereign in predestination to show mercy on whom He wills.

Arminians and pelagians will try to pull the threads of these doctrines apart. But that cannot be done. The gospel is an interdependent whole. Similarly, the Bible presents a complete tapestry of God's grace that cannot be picked apart according to our whim.

May God bless you.

37 posted on 07/26/2002 6:28:57 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
A good summary of the points consistently rejected by our Freeper Arminians.

Perhaps a sovereign God will open eyes and ears to receive these truths. He did for me!

Thanks,
drstevej
38 posted on 07/26/2002 6:33:51 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
If a man simply reads the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, the sovereignty and transcendence of God leap off of every page. The thing that convinced me of the doctrines of grace was not so much the reading but the simple logical consistency of scripture.
39 posted on 07/26/2002 6:59:26 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
Excellent post ...so glad we have met this week..
40 posted on 07/26/2002 6:59:34 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-582 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson