[narses]

Too funny, you "examine" my posts selectively, try, condemn and sentence me and THEN want me to "prove" you wrong. You are confused and you are lacking in both judgment and charity. Given that, I don't pay attention to your clumsy and antagonistic attempts at fraternal correction.

You also fail to answer my questions and ignore my wants but I will try one more time.

Stipulating for the sake of this discussion, and in fact denying this otherwise, let us say I have an anti-Catholic agenda here. I don't, but to examine this, let us say I do. Who put you in charge of rooting that agenda out and attacking me? What canon of Church Law or rule of the Catechism gives you that prerogative? Carry you a crozier that I should kiss your ring? What special dispensation from the rule against personal attacks here have you? Try hard, answer my questions with honesty and charity.

[Catholicguy]

Too funny, you "examine" my posts selectively,. I read them all and if I hadn't and posted the facts about them to source my point, you'd have accused me of "judging" you without proof. try, condemn and sentence me and THEN want me to "prove" you wrong. You are confused I am not the one who is confused and I think that is why the opposition to my pointed defense is so diffuse and melts away into addressing emotive concerns rather than the substance. Youhave yet to respond to my points. You can't. You have NEVER given the Pope the benefit of the doubt. and you are lacking in both judgment and charity. Given that, I don't pay attention to your clumsy and antagonistic attempts at fraternal correction. your constant reference to fraternal is intersting in that you are the one who shows none to the Pope.

You also fail to answer my questions and ignore my wants but I will try one more time. Frankly, that IS the locus of the problem. YOUR "wants." You want to attack the Pope unopposed. I won't tolerate that. You NEVER give the Pope the benefit of the doubt while you badger a layman to treat you as though you were the Pope.

Stipulating for the sake of this discussion, and in fact denying this otherwise, let us say I have an anti-Catholic agenda here. I don't, but to examine this, let us say I do. Who put you in charge of rooting that agenda out and attacking me? Me What canon of Church Law or rule of the Catechism gives you that prerogative? As I have noited on a few occasions, it is a Confirmational Duty. Carry you a crozier that I should kiss your ring? There is something else of mine that you can kiss. What special dispensation from the rule against personal attacks here have you? I treat you as you treat the Pope, except, I do it directly to you, using my own words. I withstand you to your face. Try hard, answer my questions with honesty and charity. I always am honest. I don't misrepresent myself. You signed-up as a Freeper on June 22 and that same day, I think it was the FIRST post, you ATTACKED The Magisterium. Name for ma another 'catholic" that has acted that way?