Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ultima ratio
"Criticism" is not what you are doing; you are in effect accusing the pope of heresy; There are substantial difference between the new mass and a Lutheran service, even though a particular priest might enter into it in the same spirit as a Lutheran minister. But Luther himself presented himself to the world for many years as a "critic."and defender of tradition. Unlike later Protestants he really thought he was returning the Church to its Patristic roots.
53 posted on 11/25/2002 10:20:24 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS; ultima ratio
***Unlike later Protestants he really thought he was returning the Church to its Patristic roots.***

Luther vs. Eck at Leipzig... Luther insists that he be corrected by Scripture not Patristics.

54 posted on 11/25/2002 10:31:07 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: RobbyS
You know I've gone over this ground a million times. There is such a thing as material, rather than formal, heresy. I don't presume to judge this Pope's motives or interior state. I'm sure he means well. This much I am certain of: he is no friend of Tradition. My heavens, look at the record.
56 posted on 11/25/2002 10:42:26 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: RobbyS
What Luther was doing was attacking Tradition. He had much in common with today's modernists. He wanted revolution and he got it.
57 posted on 11/25/2002 10:44:40 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson