Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Bush's Theology: Does President Believe He Has Divine Mandate?
Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life ^ | February 12, 2003 | Deborah Caldwell

Posted on 02/12/2003 8:35:27 PM PST by rwfromkansas

In the spring of 1999, as George W. Bush was about to announce his run for President, he agreed to be interviewed about his religious faith -- grudgingly. "I want people to judge me on my deeds, not how I try to define myself as a religious person of words."

It's hard to believe that's the same George W. Bush as now. Since taking office -- and especially in the last weeks -- Bush's personal faith has turned highly public, arguably more so than any modern president. What's important is not that Bush is talking about God but that he's talking about him differently. We are witnessing a shift in Bush's theology – from talking mostly about a Wesleyan theology of "personal transformation" to describing a Calvinist "divine plan" laid out by a sovereign God for the country and himself. This shift has the potential to affect Bush's approach to terrorism, Iraq and his presidency.

On Thursday (Feb.6) at the National Prayer Breakfast, for instance, Bush said, "we can be confident in the ways of Providence. ... Behind all of life and all of history, there's a dedication and purpose, set by the hand of a just and faithful God."

Calvin, whose ideas are critical to contemporary evangelical thought, focused on the idea of a powerful God who governs "the vast machinery of the whole world."

Bush has made several statements indicating he believes God is involved in world events and that he and America have a divinely guided mission:

-- After Bush's Sept. 20, 2001, speech to Congress, Bush speechwriter Mike Gerson called the president and said: "Mr. President, when I saw you on television, I thought -- God wanted you there." "He wants us all here, Gerson," the president responded.

In that speech, Bush said, "Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty, have always been at war, and we know that God is not neutral between them." The implication: God will intervene on the world stage, mediating between good and evil.

At the prayer breakfast, during which he talked about God's impact on history, he also said, he felt "the presence of the Almighty" while comforting the families of the shuttle astronauts during the Houston memorial service on Feb. 4.

-- In his State of the Union address last month, Bush said the nation puts its confidence in the loving God "behind all of life, and all of history" and that "we go forward with confidence, because this call of history has come to the right country. May He guide us now."

In addition to these public statements indicating a divine intervention in world events, there is evidence Bush believes his election as president was a result of God's acts.

A month after the World Trade Center attack, World Magazine, a conservative Christian publication, quoted Tim Goeglein, deputy director of White House public liaison, saying, "I think President Bush is God's man at this hour, and I say this with a great sense of humility." Time magazine reported, "Privately, Bush even talked of being chosen by the grace of God to lead at that moment." The net effect is a theology that seems to imply that God is intervening in events, is on America's side, and has chosen Bush to be in the White House at this critical moment.

"All sorts of warning signals ought to go off when a sense of personal chosenness and calling gets translated into a sense of calling and mission for a nation," says Robin Lovin, a United Methodist ethicist and professor of religion and political thought at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. Lovin says what the president seems to be lacking is theological humility and an awareness of moral ambiguity.

Richard Land, a top Southern Baptist leader with close ties to the White House, argues that Bush's sense of divine oversight is part of why he has become such a good wartime leader. He brings a moral clarity and self-confidence that inspires Americans and scares enemies. "We don't inhabit that relativist universe (of European leaders)," Land says. "We really believe some things are good and some things bad."

It's even possible that Bush's belief in America's moral rightness makes the country's military threats seem more genuine because the world thinks Bush is "on a mission."

Presidents have always used Scripture in their speeches as a source of poetry and morality, according to Michael Waldman, President Clinton's chief speechwriter, author of "POTUS Speaks" and now a visiting professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

Lincoln, he says, was the first president to use the Bible extensively in his speeches, but one of the main reasons was that his audience knew the Bible -- Lincoln was using what was then common language. Theodore Roosevelt, in his 1912 speech to the Progressive Party, closed with these words: "We stand at the edge of Armageddon." Carter, Reagan and Clinton all used Scripture, but Waldman says their use was more as a "grace note."

Bush is different, because he uses theology as the guts of his argument. "That's very unusual in the long sweep of American history," Waldman says.

Bush has clearly seen a divine aspect to his presidency since before he ran. Many Americans know the president had a religious conversion at age 39, when he, as he describes it, "came to the Lord" after a weekend of talks with the Rev. Billy Graham. Within a year, he gave up drinking and joined a men's Bible study group at First United Methodist Church in Midland, Texas. From that point on, he has often said, his Christian faith has grown.

Less well known is that, in 1995, soon after he was elected Texas governor, Bush sent a memo to his staff, asking them to stop by his office to look at a painting entitled "A Charge to Keep" by W.H.D. Koerner, lent to him by Joe O'Neill, a friend from Midland. The painting is based on the Charles Wesley hymn of the same name, and Bush told his staff he especially liked the second verse: "To serve the present age, my calling to fulfill; O may it all my powers engage to do my Master's will." Bush said those words represented their mission. "What adds complete life to the painting for me is the message of Charles Wesley that we serve One greater than ourselves."

By 1999, Bush was saying he believed in a "divine plan that supersedes all human plans." He talked of being inspired to run for president by a sermon delivered by the Rev. Mark Craig, pastor of Bush's Dallas congregation, Highland Park United Methodist Church.

Craig talked about the reluctance of Moses to become a leader. But, said Mr. Craig, then as now, people were "starved for leadership" -- leaders who sacrifice to do the right thing. Bush said the sermon "spoke directly to my heart and talked about a higher calling." But in 1999, as he prepared to run for president, he was quick to add in an interview: "Elections are determined by human beings."

Richard Land recalls being part of a group of about a dozen people who met after Bush's second inauguration as Texas governor in 1999.

At the time, everyone in Texas was talking about Bush's potential to become the next president. During the meeting, Land says, Bush said, "I believe God wants me to be president, but if that doesn't happen, it's OK." Land points out that Bush didn't say that God actually wanted him to be president. He said he believed God wanted him to be president.

During World War II, the American Protestant thinker Reinhold Niebuhr wrote about God's role in political decision-making. He believed every political leader and every political system falls short of absolute justice -- that the Allies didn't represent absolute right and Hitler didn't represent absolute evil because all of us, as humans, stand under the ultimate judgment of God. That doesn't mean politicians can't make judgments based on what they believe is right; it does mean they need to understand that their position isn't absolutely morally clear.

"Sometimes Bush comes close to crossing the line of trying to serve the nation as its religious leader, rather than its political leader," says C. Welton Gaddy, president of the Interfaith Alliance, a clergy-led liberal lobbying group.

Certainly, European leaders seem to be bothered by Bush's rhetoric and it possibly does contribute to a sense in Islamic countries that Bush is on an anti-Islamic "crusade."

Radwan Masmoudi, executive director of the Washington-based Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy, worries about it. "Muslims, all over the world, are very concerned that the war on terrorism is being hijacked by right-wing fundamentalists, and transformed into a war, or at least a conflict, with Islam. President Bush is a man of faith, and that is a positive attribute, but he also needs to learn about and respect the other faiths, including Islam, in order to represent and serve all Americans."

In hindsight, even Bush's inaugural address presaged his emerging theology. He quoted a colonist who wrote to Thomas Jefferson that "We know the race is not to the swift nor the battle to the strong. Do you not think an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm?" Then Bush said: "Much time has passed since Jefferson arrived for his inauguration. The years and changes accumulate, but the themes of this day he would know, `our nation's grand story of courage and its simple dream of dignity.'

"We are not this story's author, who fills time and eternity with his purpose. Yet his purpose is achieved in our duty, and our duty is fulfilled in service to one another. Never tiring, never yielding, never finishing, we renew that purpose today; to make our country more just and generous; to affirm the dignity of our lives and every life.

"This work continues. This story goes on. And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm."


TOPICS: Current Events; Evangelical Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: bush; catholiclist; providence; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 781-794 next last
To: Catholicguy
You're a rare creature, CG.

A Novus Ordo Buchananite.

Even Buchanan thought the war in Afghanistan was a "Just War." You and Noam Chomsky didn't.

I don't get that one. At all.

Maybe you'd like to ask the women of Afghanistan if they'd rather go back to wearing burkas and being beaten by their "men."

21 posted on 02/13/2003 11:50:35 AM PST by sinkspur (Those who unilaterally beat their swords into plowshares end up plowing for those who don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
Fasting and Prayer is needed to drive out the demons in the Dogs of War about to be unchained<>

Muslims will chop your head off while you're fasting and praying.

No. This is kill or be killed, CG. You don't talk, you don't negotiate, you don't bring peace offerings.

You kill. That's too bad, but you don't bring a knife to a gun fight.

Do you ever think what you might be driven to do were a country more powerful than us declare publicly "We are going to take out George Bush?" and then establish "No Fly" zones over Texa, Arizona, New Mexico, and Connecticut, New York,and Massachusettes and then intentionally target and destroy municipal water supplies and withold baby formula ect ect ect

If George Bush had starved me the way Hussein is starving his own people, I wouldn't have waited for somebody else to take him out.

22 posted on 02/13/2003 11:56:33 AM PST by sinkspur (Those who unilaterally beat their swords into plowshares end up plowing for those who don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
http://www.lewrockwell.com/peirce/peirce63.html

<> LOL I like the N.O. Buchananite line. Here is a link to one you might think far more credible than me. Check out his war resume at bottom of his column.<>
23 posted on 02/13/2003 12:29:32 PM PST by Catholicguy (Follow the money. This is about Oil and Currency. Will the Euro or the Dollar triumph?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
Mr. Peirce fought with the Rhodesian freedom fighters (the Ian Smith side, of course).

Your hero fought with Ian Smith's racists - this being the same Ian Smith, whose stupid, racist revolt virtually ensured the ultimate radicalization of Zimbabwe.

You're taking insane political advice from a moron like this?

And I won't even go into the whole issue of comparisons of Hitler to Bush, or the fact that he's in bed with that cretin Rockwell.

24 posted on 02/13/2003 12:42:09 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine (those who unilaterally beat their swords into plowshares wind up plowing for those who don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
Pierce is a libertarian idiot, a craven follower of the "blame America first" crowd led by Harry Browne.

Anybody who compares George W. Bush to Hitler has lost touch with reality.

Military credentials mean little when you hate your country.

25 posted on 02/13/2003 12:44:36 PM PST by sinkspur (Those who unilaterally beat their swords into plowshares end up plowing for those who don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur
I've said it before; the extreme right wing meets up with the extreme left wing and they end up holding hands and skipping and singing, "tra-la-la-la-laaaa!" all the way down the garden path of paranoia and delusion.
27 posted on 02/13/2003 12:47:51 PM PST by wimpycat ("Gee, I wish we had one of them doomsday machines!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Don't be such a cowboy.Remember your priestly aspirations?
28 posted on 02/13/2003 12:50:46 PM PST by Codie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Codie; sinkspur
I never thought "cowboy" and "priest" were mutually exclusive.
29 posted on 02/13/2003 12:52:32 PM PST by wimpycat ("Gee, I wish we had one of them doomsday machines!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
(yes, I do think he is dumb)

Based on anything substantial, or is it just a 'feeling' you have?

30 posted on 02/13/2003 12:53:09 PM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Codie
Don't be such a cowboy.Remember your priestly aspirations?

I have a wife. My priestly aspirations went up in smoke when I married her 26 years ago.

31 posted on 02/13/2003 12:55:26 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
"I find it both sickening and frightening such an evil epoch can be reframed as being the Will of God."

So basically you are saying you don't have faith in God. I see.

32 posted on 02/13/2003 12:57:06 PM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wrigley; CCWoody; drstevej; OrthodoxPresbyterian
bump...some folks here need to realize that God is in control of everything.
33 posted on 02/13/2003 1:17:51 PM PST by rwfromkansas (What is the chief end of man? To glorify God and enjoy Him forever. --- Westminster Catechism Q1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Codie
Codie, the Christian faith is not a PASSIVE faith where all we do is sit around and pray all day. We take action to fight for what is right in this world. Bush is doing that due to his faith and it is time we stop attacking him with some heretical crazy idea that he is a threat and instead praise God that we have a man who is guided by a sense of purpose and a recognition of him being chosen for this task.
34 posted on 02/13/2003 1:21:00 PM PST by rwfromkansas (What is the chief end of man? To glorify God and enjoy Him forever. --- Westminster Catechism Q1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Christians suffered prior to 9/11,we didn't care.Now we care? Are we going after China next?
35 posted on 02/13/2003 1:46:41 PM PST by Codie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: Catholicguy
he is adopting the "good guys" vs. the "bad guys" approach.

That's because people who deliberately annihilate thousands of innocents, including women and children, are the bad guys. Those that seek to protect innocents, and women and children, are understood by most to be the good guys.

37 posted on 02/13/2003 3:47:55 PM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
Bush is going to war, Catholicguy, to protect you and me and our children (if you have any). He knows that if we don't fight pure evil (in possession of weapons of mass destruction) now, we will have to fight it later, after millions have been wiped out. He is right. There is nothing wrong with fighting evil. It is required.
38 posted on 02/13/2003 3:50:31 PM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
CG, are you French?
39 posted on 02/13/2003 3:58:19 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: drstevej; sandyeggo; yendu bwam; rwfromkansas; Codie; MEGoody; sinkspur; Chancellor Palpatine
CG, are you French?

No, he is banned. Looks like somebody didn't like what he had to say.

Catholicguy signed up 2001-04-01.
This account has been banned.

BigMack

40 posted on 02/13/2003 4:08:51 PM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 781-794 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson