Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ultima ratio
Your back to your old list again. Boring.
59 posted on 06/06/2003 9:19:35 PM PDT by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: St.Chuck
Sure the list is boring. But it has led to the ruin of millions of souls by encouraging indifferentism and sycretism--both heresies.
69 posted on 06/06/2003 9:44:29 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: St.Chuck
__________________________________________________________
Die Furche - "How do you understand ecumenism? Does it mean integrating the other churches into the Catholic Church? The more recent documents seem to be walking in this direction…."

Walter Kasper - "The decision of Vatican II, to which the Pope adheres and spreads, is absolutely clear: Today we no longer understand ecumenism in the sense of the ecumenism of a return, by which the others should 'be converted' and return to being 'catholics.' This was expressly abandoned by Vatican II. Today ecumenism is considered as the common road: all should be converted to the following of Christ, and it is in Christ that we will find ourselves in the end. …. Even the Pope, among other things, describes ecumenism in Ut unum sint as an exchange of gifts. I think this is very well said: each church has its own riches and gifts of the Spirit, and it is this exchange that is trying to be achieved and not the fact that we should become 'protestants' or that the others should become 'catholics' in the sense of accepting the confessional form of Catholicism" (Adista, Rome, February 26, 2001, p. 9).
____________________________________________________________
What is this but indifferentism?
75 posted on 06/06/2003 9:57:33 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson