Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ninenot
If you want the REALLY long version, Fr. Rutler wrote a book on the various philosophical schools and their effects.

Actually it was Fr. Rutler speaking on EWTN about 10 years ago, who first began the process of my conversion to tradition. He was giving a talk on modern philosophies, and he was comparing the Catholic tradition of realist philosophy with the false and dangerous modern philosophy of phenomenology. I asked myself, "Wait a second, isn't the pope a phenomenologist?" That small pebble started the landslide until finally I realized that everything I had been accepting as part of the Catholic Church was "false and dangerous." I even had participated in Renew -- at a parish that was famous for being ultra-conservative. The pastor of this same ultra-conservative parish told my wife it was okay to use contraception. Then I realized that phenomenology was the underlying philosophy for the Church's new approach to morality as well. The whole thing was built on a lie; every bit of the "post-conciliar Church" was based upon a false and dangerous philosophy.

68 posted on 07/16/2003 1:52:32 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Maximilian
Phenomenology, per se is the wrong philosophy. JPII, however, married phenomenology to Thomism. It wasn't easy, and his work is still largely unexplained by people like Fr. Ripperger (who, along with Rutler, could break it down into edible bits...) but it will happen.
75 posted on 07/16/2003 4:58:31 PM PDT by ninenot (Torquemada: Due for Revival Soon!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson