Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
They're just not essential.

The only thing essential in the Mass is the consecration and communion. Still, the Church Fathers and doctors all venerated inessential things such as the Roman Canon, offertory, Gregorian Chant, and the like. Up until Vatican 2, the Church always treated old, universally-practed and papally sanctioned inessentials with the utmost reverence, reforming them only rarely and incrimentally. Never before the 1960's was there such a radical and rapid purge of such inessentials. The post-Vatican 2 reforms are totally unprecidented.

86 posted on 07/21/2003 12:04:06 PM PDT by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: traditionalist
Never before the 1960's was there such a radical and rapid purge of such inessentials. The post-Vatican 2 reforms are totally unprecidented.

True. The Church should have allowed the Tridentine Mass to continue to be offered, alongside the Novus Ordo. That was a big mistake.

But non-essentials are non-essentials. Jesus tried to rid the Judaism of his day of silly laws and observances and strictures and requirements. "Strain at gnats and swallow camels."

But, those who wished to hang on to the non-essentials after Vatican II should have been allowed to do so.

88 posted on 07/21/2003 12:12:13 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson