Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: All
The issue of Biblical Translation Fundamentalism is essential to our faith. At it's base is the question of what you as an individual believe. Perhaps more important academically, the issue raises the invariable question of what individual ministers believe it is that they minister, and from whence comes their authority so to do. This is today mostly a non-issue because the unfortunate majority of ministers of the so-called "gospel" are actually preaching their own gospel of socio-political advocacy and would actually do better to move into that line of work, preferably after gaining some credentials, and stop impersonating priests. The simple and incontrovertible fact is that the AV1611 is the only true Bible, by this we refer to the one and only Holy Bible authorized for the Church of England by His Majesty King James the VI, and I, for which he was almost exploded in the gunpowder plot credit to the satanic devices of Roman Popery. Our premises in this simple scientific question must be straightforward; given that there does exist a God, and given that the same God has somewhere in time communicated anything with mankind, would there exist today a record of it? For every true Christian the answer is resoundingly affirmative. I do not believe in a God that would give us His Holy Word as a rule and guide for our living and faith only to let it fall into the corruption of a thousand translated copyrighted rags derived on the confidence of popery. The simple facts are these, and you will not learn this in any seminary in the world although it is a common sense deduction; any minister who does not acknowledge the AV1611 has no authority on which to preach save that of his contrived priesthood, furthermore any minister who uses an English Translation other that the AV1611 is a de facto servant of H.H. the Pontiff, Self Proclaimed Vicar of Christ on earth. If you who disregard the AV1611 as antiquated would ask your master the Pontifex Maximus where the word of God is, he would point to himself, because he cannot err, according to his own decree in the nineteenth century, when speaking ex cathedra. Not only is the pontiff sole propreitor of the word of God for all Romanists, but he technically is God for all Romanists. Why do modern Christians need the real God when they have there master in Rome. Make no mistake, if the AV1611 is the only version translated without the use of the Vaticanus manuscripts, which no one outside the Vatican hierarchy has ever laid eyes on but only been furnished with copies, then it is certainly the only version free of the vile touch of Satan. Every modern so-called Protestant Christian must ask himself; is the Vatican the place that I will put my trust for the true word of God?
35 posted on 08/07/2003 10:20:34 PM PDT by Ryan Bailey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Ryan Bailey
What planet are you from? Your planet seems to have an institution called the Roman Catholic Church that bears no resemblance whatsoever to the Roman Catholic Church on this planet.
37 posted on 08/08/2003 3:21:17 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
OMG, where did you copy this from? I especially like this howler:

"Make no mistake, if the AV1611 is the only version translated without the use of the Vaticanus manuscripts, which no one outside the Vatican hierarchy has ever laid eyes on but only been furnished with copies, then it is certainly the only version free of the vile touch of Satan."

The Church lady could not have done better!

Oh-you're serious? Never mind...

38 posted on 08/08/2003 5:51:50 AM PDT by jboot (Faith is not a work; swarming, however, is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey; Wrigley; Revelation 911; Alex Murphy
***Every modern so-called Protestant Christian must ask himself; is the Vatican the place that I will put my trust for the true word of God?***

Just wait til Pope Piel I is elevated... a Calvinist dispensationalist who prefers the greek and hebrew text over the 1611-KJV.

BTW, I am on vacation right now and there is some mixed bathing going on here and I have not organized a protest.
39 posted on 08/08/2003 6:28:41 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey; drstevej; CARepubGal; Alex Murphy; xzins; Wrigley
The simple and incontrovertible fact is that the AV1611 is the only true Bible, by this we refer to the one and only Holy Bible authorized for the Church of England by His Majesty King James the VI, and I, for which he was almost exploded in the gunpowder plot credit to the satanic devices of Roman Popery.

Ryan - would that be inclusive of the Apocrypha or exclusive

41 posted on 08/08/2003 6:45:59 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
I left Rome and never did convert to the KJV, but to Jesus Christ only.
46 posted on 08/08/2003 7:17:55 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
" I do not believe in a God that would give us His Holy Word as a rule and guide for our living and faith only to let it fall into the corruption of a thousand translated copyrighted rags derived on the confidence of popery."

Bravo!

Now put on your asbestos Kakha and duck.

93 posted on 08/18/2003 9:15:42 PM PDT by editor-surveyor ( . Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson