To: Remember_Salamis
***that we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq.***
But haven't the all-knowing liberals assured us that Iraq had nothing to do with Al-Queada.
4 posted on
05/18/2007 3:43:21 AM PDT by
fkabuckeyesrule
(Good News everyone!!!! It's baseball season!!!!!)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Guess someone better point out to the Do Nothings that Saddam invaded Kuwait and was headed for Saudi Arabia. THEY may think they can just hide their heads up their butts and ignore the fact that the West’s economic viablity rests on the free flow of Oil from the ME, but the rest of us do not have the luxury of being that stupid.
10 posted on
05/18/2007 3:47:59 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(If you will try being smarter, I will try being nicer.)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
The only liberal to participate in that exchange was Rudy Giuliani.
Ron Paul is the most conservative candidate in the debate. In fact, National Review's John Derbyshire wrote yesterday that Paul is "to conservative for the Republican Party" and suggested the Constitution Party.
So when did the GOP put up the "conservatives not welcome" sign up front, but infanticidal cross-dressing mayors welcome.
11 posted on
05/18/2007 3:48:44 AM PDT by
Remember_Salamis
(A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
This whole deal started in the 70s when the Arab Dictators realized the PLO would never go “home”. They needed to pick a “bogeyman” to focus the radicals on and they picked the West.
Keeps the little buggers busy and the dictators in power.
12 posted on
05/18/2007 3:50:02 AM PDT by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson