To: traviskicks
IMHO, Ron Paul doesn't have a chance nationally to capture a sufficient majority to win the White House even in a three-man or two-man and one-woman race. Even if he did his policies would not pass the Congress that would be seated which at the present moment appears to be a majority Democratic Congress ... he could not stop budget increases, IRS Code growth or seat Supreme Court Justices of conservative or libertarian beliefs - since all controlled by Congress. His Executive Orders and management of the Executive Branch, following his stated ideals and beliefs, could well set the public up for a tremendous amount of chaos during and after his term.
Paul does have enough money to be a real spoiler and catapult a liberal into the White House though.
12 posted on
11/05/2007 7:38:04 AM PST by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: K-oneTexas
On the non chance that Paul became president both parties would refuse to deal with him rendering him isolated and ineffective in the white house for his single term.
13 posted on
11/05/2007 7:42:53 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: K-oneTexas
Paul does have enough money to be a real spoiler and catapult a liberal into the White House though. How? He's not running as a 3rd party or independent candidate.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson