I don’t know if this thread is dead, but I just found a You Tube video exposing the fact that Perry is paying for registration throughout the state, some found to be drug felons.
That seems like the usual Democrat tactic, but wondering what you supporters think about it. Does it bother you or do you think it is just a smart way to spend campaign money?
Here is the URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4H9l8TEa-Q
omegabea, please don’t confuse me as a Perry supporter. I will NOT be voting for him or KBH for that matter.
omegabea, please don’t confuse me as a Perry supporter. I will NOT be voting for him, KBH or any other RINO—no matter who Sarah Palin endorses.
Oops, sorry about the double post :)
Oh, no! If you go to #47 you’ll see that I said I would not vote for either Hutchinson or Perry. But in my case it doesn’t matter since I live in Washington State. I can’t vote in Texas.
Here there has been a pattern of people who run for office saying one thing then, once in office, doing another. I call these sort of politicians ‘heartbreakers’. My thesis is that it is better to have candidates running in the primaries who have a voting history on issues rather than someone who doesn’t. Medina doesn’t seem to have a voting history.
My interest in the election in Texas is due to the illegal alien issue, which is also present in my state.
I don’t consider this a big deal one way or the other. An Amway/Mary Kay type process securing voter registration without a full fledge background check will leave open the opportunity for some to be involved to make a few bucks. I saw two of these people at a tea party I attended and they were working the crowd trying to sign up people. This has been in the news in several papers a few days ago.