So is it not possible, in your opinion, to criticize w/o being considered to be insultive, hateful, etc.? I always thought that criticism was a good thing, in that it makes us better people in the long run.
Hint: Previously reading thru any of the various 'Palin campaigns for McCain' threads will greatly enhance your chances for achieving the answer.
Also, you may wish to keep these words in mind:
contradictory - ironic - hypocrisy
I'm betting you will get it because you and I, for the most part, see this site thru similar eyes.
Calling the Reagan Presidency a failure and rejecting the Reagan agenda is not mere criticism. Its hatefilled lunacy. Turning around and evoking Reagan in his last election run for potus, makes Paul a hypocrite. Paul’s long friendship with Murray Rothbard, the founder of modern libertarianism, his friendly association with Lew Rockwell and his praising the Birchers just last year, is off the wall. And this is not guilt by association either, so don’t even go there. All these guys think alike. Their politics are fringe wackoism.