Posted on 02/21/2010 6:39:37 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
(sorry for the double-post!)
Ummmmmmmm
Neither is she.
If she does, and she is the nominee, we won’t see the White House for a long, long time.
and again, when she comes out and speaks she doesn’t really say anything.
She talks about
less spending
budget deficits being too big
Pro Life
Strong military.
All I see your posting history champion consistently is Gay Rights lol
Yep, knew you’d go and review my posts to see what I know and what I stand for. I did figure that out from your less than coherent sentence (a la Palin). Let’s talk about geting the economy strong. What does she know about a strong military? What does she know of DoD acquisition and why it takes so long to get a weapon system developed and fielded? Everyone talks about the budget deficits being too big, including Meg Whitman and Carly Forina. Michelle Bachman is WAY more suited to the presidency than Palin. Do you think the book Game Change was only about John Edwards? The best things about Palin are her shoes and her family. She is supposed to be the advocate now for children with special needs and their families; please point to me where she has attended any conference for children with special needs, understands the special education process. I’ve been living that process for 15 years - but I’m not “running for office” as you say she is - if she really wants to be a strong voice, then she should start advocating for children to get the education they are entitled to under IDEA (if she does know what that means).
>>We need a new political party. One where Ron Paul is welcome<<
haha, good luck with that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.