[Presto]

UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide,

Your point about that I do not have a vote to cast on the Supreme Court is a reiteration of your original argument in your first response-post. There you essentially said that it does not matter how law is worded because the unconscionable left will always play word games to distort the meaning such that the Constitution is effectively inoperable as the law of the land.

I agree with you that unfortunate word games are played that hurt our laws. But I do not agree that such damage has rendered our Constitution inoperable as law.

I think that we are still a nation of laws more so than a nation of men.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

I think that we are still a nation of laws more so than a nation of men.

Just an example: The nation's law is that people who come to this country without permission or overstay must be deported. But the bureaucracy of men doesn't bother to keep track of most of them. The police of men only occasionally round a few up for publicity. The judiciary of men finds endless excuses to let them stay. The states of men are prevented by federal authorities of men from deporting anybody.

Let me know when you stop dreaming.