Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

To: ARepublicanForAllReasons
Others will choose 'a little temporary safety' in exchange for the chains of tyranny.

I hardly call banning a hazardous and crime provoking substance "tyranny".

But, if you insist, lets just do away with all laws that regulate behavior (and they ALL do) and just have anarchy. Lots and lots of liberty for everyone!!!! But no safety for any but the richest and the most heavily armed.

The question is not if we will have laws that regulate private behavior, we will, the question is, Where is the line.

53 posted on 04/20/2010 6:10:43 PM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: John O
I hardly call banning a hazardous and crime provoking substance "tyranny".

If Iran and China can't control their addicts, how much authoritarianism would it take to control the addicts here in the USA? Even doing away with Habeus Corpus and the Right to a fair trial wouldn't be extreme enough, as witness China and Iran.

How about deputizing 100,000 yahoos to shoot suspected dealers/users on site? That would destroy our nation faster than any drug habit could.

55 posted on 04/20/2010 7:38:15 PM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (President Zero, walking in the footsteps of Hugo Chavez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson