Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

To: Bokababe

You hypocritically claim that you want to discuss this based upon individual rights and not group rights but then go on to make the argument that we need to treat the two groups of hetero and homo equally. Here are your words:

“This would discipline both disruptive heteros and homos with the same measure. “

Again you are showing that you cannot even follow your own thought process. One second you are against group rights and then you are arguing for group rights. You want heterosexuality and homosexuality treated equally by your own words. This may be your morality but it is a perverted morality.

Why don’t you give one example of a practical reason to divide men and women facilities based upon physiology. There is none.

And there is no tangent in regards to coed facilities but that is instead the crux of the issue in where Paul is violating the individual rights of our men and women in the Armed Forces. Paul has voted for a bill that would force men and women to bunk with and shower with people who openly admit to having a perversion towards people of the same gender. So in essence we have a double standard then whereas we discriminate against coed facilities based upon heterosexual behavior but force people to have to deal with homosexual behavior.

Basically Paul’s words that you posted on this issue state clearly enough that Paul morally believes that homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality. He is a pervert and has no respect for true equality under the law. His constant attacks on our military and National Security in order to promote his perverted morality is pathetic.


168 posted on 05/28/2010 12:30:11 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigIf
"You hypocritically claim that you want to discuss this based upon individual rights"

Let me rephrase it for you in long form: "Sexually disruptive behavior" is "sexually disruptive behavior", period -- no place in the military, same discipline regardless of the sexual orientation of the individual.

Why don’t you give one example of a practical reason to divide men and women facilities based upon physiology. There is none.

Good grief, if I have to spell this one out for you, then you have no business debating anything that requires actual use of brain synapses:

Because women don't have the physical equipment to use urinals. Because women have menstrual periods. Because it takes a woman on average longer to use the bathroom than it does a man. One of the reasons to separate male and female restrooms in large venues is efficiency -- you can turn over more men needing to urinate by installing urinals than you can turn over women using a stall. Physiological differences.

My thoughts yesterday were correct. Waste of time and energy.

169 posted on 05/28/2010 1:22:52 PM PDT by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson