“He hasn’t had to go negative.”
On what planet? Paul was the first to go negative against Newt in Iowa. Yes, even before Mitt did.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69859.html
Paultards have redefined negative. From the “have you had a gay affair with Perry” ads, to making fun of Huntsman’s adopted children. They put the dis in disgusting.
Thank you Josh for pointing that out. I quit reading the idiotic article at that point. I knew then the author was a Paul Tard.
No, Paul was the one who was responsible for most of theanti-Perry campaign. Perry just doubled down on his own destruction with his early debate performances. He sure turned that around tonight. Maybe too late, though.
Paul is a bigger nut than Ross Perot and more dangerous. He followers are dumber. Ron Paul utters nonsense and his supporters cheer. It doesn’t matter if he makes sense, he supports legalization of drugs! YEY!
Yep. It took three sentences before the first outright, bald-faced lie. That’s where I stopped reading.
Of course, I should have looked at who posted it and skipped the drivel altogether.