Posted on 04/14/2010 5:42:14 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
ARLINGTON, Va. — Thinking of writing a few choice words in an online “white power” chat room? Think again.
The Pentagon is cracking down on extremism in its ranks with a new set of rules restricting servicemembers from participating on the Web sites of supremacist groups.
A new Defense Department directive on dissident and political activity issued on November 27 — the first since 1996 — says servicemembers “must not actively advocate supremacist doctrine, ideology, or causes.” This includes writing blogs or posting on Web sites.
The new directive is the first at the Defense Department-level to address Internet-based supremacist affiliations. It went unannounced until it was reported in a blog Friday by Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff, who tracked down the military service records of two members of the Michigan-based Hutaree militia group that recently was raided by federal law enforcement groups.
Such groups are “detrimental to good order, discipline, or mission accomplishment,” the Pentagon now says.
Last July, Stars and Stripes reported that 130 members of newsaxon.org, a social networking Web site affiliated with the National Socialist Movement, had listed “military” as their job in “Facebook”-style user profiles. Swatsikas, Nazi symbolism and militant imagery emblazon the site.
The Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil rights group in Montgomery, Ala., presented dozens of the user profiles to Congress and the Pentagon. The center estimates “thousands” of extremists serve in the ranks and has lobbied the Pentagon for three years to adopt clearer anti-hate measures and more vigorously pursue servicemembers known to be affiliating with hate groups.
“At long last, we think it’s a great thing,” said Mark Potok, editor of the Intelligence Report, an SPLC magazine. “This really seems like an important change. Although some people chose to deny it, this is a very real problem in the military.”
Jeff Schoep, who calls himself “commander” of the National Socialist Movement and New Saxon, said he was unaware of the new military rules and said no military officials have approached him investigating participation on their Web site. But he blasted the Pentagon for limiting free speech and lumping all right-wing groups like his together.
"I don’t think it’s going to discourage people," he said. “I think they’re on a witch hunt.”
Stripes' reporting, he said, drew more attention to their site from the ranks.
"There was a good number of military people that did come on after that, that had not known about the site," Schoep said.
Army and Defense Department officials said at the time that extremist activity was not considered “an Army-wide issue.” And there was confusion, Potok said, about what defined “active participation.” Previously, membership alone in an extremist group was not enough for disciplinary action, though banned activities included distributing materials and demonstrating.
“The one worry here is that enforcement of these regulations may be very uneven. It leaves the decision up to local commanders and we’ve really yet to see how that’s going to work,” Potok said. “The hope is that this clarifies that even advocacy of these kinds of ideas is not consistent with being in the military.”
But it probably still is OK to talk to anti-US imams abroad.
Of course, it’s okay to blog to one’s heart’s content on a Black Panther site or a La Raza site or an ELF site or ... well, you get the picture.
Hmmmm seems to me that the Constitution is being violated by the pentagon. Freedom of association perhaps????
Guess someone forgot to tell that Ft. Hood dirtbag.
Apparently the Pentagon can’t read Spanish, Arabic, Chinese....
Maybe they should be sent links to “Non White” racist sites?
Precisely. Will the stupid bastards at the pentagon punish muslim soldiers who support islamic terrorism? How about black or latino soldiers who are in street gangs?
Remember nidal hassan’s warning signs? Will they continue to hide their heads in the sand and write dangerous muslim internet activity off as “research?”
Free Republic, TEA Party, and veterans’ groups included? After all, zero’s admin considers all of the above to be national security threats...
How long until FR is banned as a “right wing extremist hate site” for not towing the Obammunist line?
Free Republic is regularly scanned by military intelligence now.
LOL
How about the Nation of Islam?
.....and I have proof of it. :)
“How about the Nation of Islam?”
It, too. (I could have listed several pages worth of hate groups and extremists that are NOT peopled by conservatives. But, for the sake of brevity, I only listed a small handful.)
The NOI is conservative by most measures. If they were white they would be called right wing racist haters. And according to a couple of black women I used to know who went to one of their meetings, they are misogynists, too.
I don’t by any stretch of the imagination consider NOI conservative. It is a fascist group not unlike the Nazis. And the Nazis were not conservatives.
I bet they don’t mind if you’re in La Raza, though.
What? No! Really? Really?? I can't believe it!! (SAOTP)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.