It is a short, passioned ..scree. He does raise good, common, fundamental questions that always should be raised about blind obedience.
Anyone familiar with military history wouldn’t be upset with the gist of what he is attempting. However, his article is poorly and emotionally written, and grossly untrue. He doesn’t do his argument, such as it is, any favors. Others have written much better. Good that is is short. It’s a waste of time.