I've read the law, and it's very poor. Most other states clearly define in the beginning any terms used in the law, but their laws don't. The judges appear to have read the law and followed it strictly, using dictionary definition. The legislature is at fault here. Other legislatures should look at this situation and amend their laws to cover such loopholes that may exist.
For example, NH laws and possibly others define adultery as sexual intercourse. A better definition would be sexual or intimate relations, which would have had this girl nailed for adultery. I just checked my state laws and they define adultry as man and woman. Such a ruling could happen here, too if the judges practice conservative judicial activism.
My point exactly.. The judges could just as easily taken a wide birth in interrupting this case, however once again the secularist judges decided not to. When it came to the Texas Gay case another court chose to find hidden meanings of words that didn't exist.. Save it friend.. you are part of the problem, nowhere close to a solution.