Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defend Arab Dissidents
townhall.com ^ | 12/09/04 | Clifford D. May

Posted on 12/09/2004 7:44:24 PM PST by kattracks

"It is outrageous and amazing," wrote Salama Ni'mat, a columnist for the London-based Arabic-language daily Al-Hayat, "that the first free and general elections in the history of the Arab nation are to take place in January: in Iraq, under the auspices of American occupation, and in Palestine, under the auspices of the Israeli occupation."

Outrageous and amazing, perhaps. Illogical, hardly. In recent years, Americans and Israelis have begun to learn a difficult lesson: thugs and despots, even those who smile, take your money and call you friend, are not to be trusted. Better to quarrel with a democrat than toast with a dictator.

Yes, you say, but who are we to foist democracy on the Arabs? Maybe they regard such ideas as alien. Perhaps they would rather not bear the strain of choosing their own leaders.

Not at all, Ni'mat wrote in a recent column (translated by the invaluable Middle East Media Research Institute, MEMRI). "What prevents some of the Arab regimes from holding free and genuine elections is their fear of the results, and nothing more - that is, their fear of the will of their peoples."

If that wasn't enough to raise blood pressure among the Middle East's ruling classes, Ni'mat also called it “sad and pathetic that certain countries today are treating the Iraqis with the cheapest kind of political hypocrisy, even though no one heard any particular Arab protest during the time of the Regime of the Mass Graves” -- a poetic way of referring to Saddam Hussein's bloody dictatorship.

And he concluded with this challenge: “Can independent and sovereign Arab countries give their peoples something better than what the occupation is giving today to Iraq and Palestine?"

Ni'mat may not be part of a chorus, but he's hardly alone. Recently, Egyptian journalist Nabil Sharaf Al-Din expressed similar ideas -- on Al-Jazeera television, of all places.

"We are not being fair to the current Iraqi government,” he said. “Not me, nor you, nor the other guest on this program, not even the viewers. But history will do justice to them. These people are establishing the first democracy in the Middle East. This country will be a platform for liberties in the whole region. … For the first time the Iraqi leader will be elected by Iraqi ballots."

The displeased interviewer quoted Sheik Al-Dhari, head of the Sunni Clerics Council in Iraq, to the effect that Americans would not permit real democracy but only continued occupation.

Nabil Sharaf Al-Din fired back: "This Al-Dhari is a mufti of terrorism and slaughter. This Al-Dhari is the military branch of the murderers, the military branch of terrorism and televised slaughtering This Al-Dhari ... and his group... Sir, please...”

Such flowerings of truth are encouraging. Still, it is not inevitable that the Middle East's fledgling pro-democracy dissidents will defeat the forces of totalitarianism, Baathism, jihadism and terrorism.

If they are to prevail, they will need help and support from the peoples of the Free World, just as the dissidents of Eastern Europe did.

But most Western Europeans regard the notion of Arabs living in decent, democratic societies as ludicrous – like Eskimos wearing bikinis.

The United Nations long ago morphed into a dictators' protection society. We now know that officials at the highest levels worked hand-in-glove with the “Regime of the Mass Graves,” and that they ignored the killing fields of Darfur as long as possible.

Even most of the American media view Arab freedom fighters as either inauthentic or uninteresting. Last Sunday, as the Libyan dissident Fathi Eljami was being held, incommunicado and ailing, in Moammer Gadhafi's infamous Abu Salim prison, The New York Times Travel Section featured Libya, which it called “a once-forbidden fruit ...a complicated and confounding land.”

The Times writer added: "Despite American air strikes designed to kill its leaders, and a Bush administration that has enflamed Muslims around the world, I found the Libyans to be warm and self-deprecating. And despite being branded a rogue terrorist state by the international community, Libya felt perfectly safe in both urban and rural areas."

What's next? A wine tour of North Korea?

The State Department could do much more to support President Bush's “forward strategy of freedom” and “Broader Middle East and North Africa Initiative.” Perhaps it will, once Condoleeza Rice takes command.

Meantime, in one corner of the “broader” Middle East this week, Hamid Karzai was sworn in as Afghanistan's first elected president. "We thank the people of the United States of America for bringing us this day, a day of peace, a day of democracy, a day of empowerment of the Afghan people," Karzai said.

Should Americans ever lose their willingness to bring about such days, it is unlikely that anyone else would take up the burden.

Clifford D. May is the president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a policy institute focusing on terrorism and a Townhall.com member group.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; axisofweasels; elbaradei; geopolitcs; iaea; napalminthemorning; neoeunazis; religionofpeace; wot

1 posted on 12/09/2004 7:44:24 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Excellent.


2 posted on 12/09/2004 7:51:09 PM PST by prairiebreeze (It's my right to publically celebrate Christmas and state my faith in Christ. At least for now.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yes, you say, but who are we to foist democracy on the Arabs?

We bring freedom to the imprisoned and truth to those who are imprisoned by lies.

May God forgive us if we err in doing what we perceive is our Godly duty.

3 posted on 12/09/2004 7:51:21 PM PST by weenie ("A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants." -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Yes, you say, but who are we to foist democracy on the Arabs? Maybe they regard such ideas as alien. Perhaps they would rather not bear the strain of choosing their own leaders.

Talk about you're "soft bigotry".
Oh no thanks I'd much rather live in fear that something I say may land me in prison. Beside I really enjoy being poor.


4 posted on 12/09/2004 9:48:21 PM PST by Valin (Out Of My Mind; Back In Five Minutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

THE CASE FOR DEMOCRACY
The Power of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny and Terror
NATAN SHARANSKY
WITH RON DERMER

http://www.publicaffairsbooks.com/publicaffairsbooks-cgi-bin/display?book=1586482610

A passionate, controversial argument against compromises on the road to freedom, by the renowned former dissident, human rights activist and Jewish leader

Natan Sharansky believes that the truest expression of democracy is the ability to stand in the middle of a town square and express one's views without fear of imprisonment. He should know. A dissident in the USSR, Sharansky was jailed for nine years for challenging Soviet policies. During that time he reinforced his moral conviction that democracy is essential to both protecting human rights and maintaining global peace and security.
Sharansky was catapulted onto the Israeli political stage in 1996. In the last eight years, he has served as a minister in four different Israeli cabinets, including a stint as Deputy Prime Minister, playing a key role in government decision making from the peace negotiations at Wye to the war against Palestinian terror. In his views, he has been as consistent as he has been stubborn: Tyranny, whether in the Soviet Union or the Middle East, must always be made to bow before democracy.

Drawing on a lifetime of experience of democracy and its absence, Sharansky believes that only democracy can safeguard the well-being of societies. For Sharansky, when it comes to democracy, politics is not a matter of left and right, but right and wrong.

This is a passionately argued book from a man who carries supreme moral authority to make the case he does here: that the spread of democracy everywhere is not only possible, but also essential to the survival of our civilization. His argument is sure to stir controversy on all sides; this is arguably the great issue of our times.

Natan Sharansky is a former Soviet dissident, political prisoner, and human rights icon who has spent his life championing democracy and freedom. He now serves as the Minister for Jerusalem and Diaspora Affairs in the Israeli Government.



Valin says MUST READ!


5 posted on 12/09/2004 9:51:31 PM PST by Valin (Out Of My Mind; Back In Five Minutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Valin says MUST READ

OK.

6 posted on 12/10/2004 12:44:59 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: happygrl

Natan Sharansky: The Power of Freedom; What Soviet dissidents, Scoop Jackson, and Reagan understood
NRO ^ | December 08, 2004 | Natan Sharansky with Ron Dermer

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1296922/posts
Posted on 12/08/2004 9:12:47 AM CST by Tolik


7 posted on 12/10/2004 4:44:12 AM PST by Valin (Out Of My Mind; Back In Five Minutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson