The question that caught my eye is "you don't believe people are born 'gay'?" and its variants. The effort is assuming that somehow the start position is to assume science has accepted born 'gay' and that the learned behavior is novel. (Its similar to the classic "how often do you beat your wife?")
I mention this only to keep a heads up as the homosexual debate is going to heat up in the next few months. They are going to push the "born" fallacy because it has their only tool to force acceptance into homosexual marriage and child adoptions.
Spot on observation! We'll be ready for the trolls.
Facts and documentation posted here: Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Revision 1.1)
The gay NGO's will argue that line to the Supreme Court in their Article IV constitutional-law attack on DOMA and its state equivalents. Thanks to the foresworn chief justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and her coconspirators on the SJC, the homosexual law firms (they are legion, like the Gadarene swine, and just as driven) will get that chance very soon.
Queer theory argues the opposite, however, and insists that sexuality is fluid and mutable; and that cognitive dissonance within the gay camp, compounded with Dr. Robert Spitzer's inability to locate a gene identifiable as "the gay gene" (other pro-gay researchers are hard at work, however) will be what the Supreme Court will eventually weigh.