Posted on 10/24/2001 8:03:12 AM PDT by d-back
That one costs fifty.
And if you want to stuff your seven year old in one, 12B, be my guest. Just don't tell me to put my seven year old into one. I mean, seven year olds are in second grade, for cryin' out loud. Who's the parent here--me or the State of New Jersey?
Bear in mind that New Jersey's Supreme Court found that it was "unconstitutional" to require abortionists to notify a parent before sucking a baby out of your teenage girl's uterus. This new "seatbelt" law now requires drivers to make sure their seventeen year old daughter is wearing a seatbelt, but that same parent has no "right" to know if an abortionist is going to operate on his daughter.
Old enough for abortion, not old enough to sit in a car without a seatbelt. Go figure that one.
But should my friend, who has a six-year-old, 75lb son be required by law to treat his bruiser in the same manner? This kid could eat a oncoming car.
Now my dad would be headed to prison, especially after they found out he had beer in the cooler.
If you are transporting your children, no amount of burdensome regulation is too great for you to bear.
If we are transporting your children, we'll handle them like the gorrilla handles the suitcase in an old American Tourister commercial, because we just don't care.
We just had two children killed in a car wreck locally. Both were thrown from the car. No seat belt. What do you do? Do you say "If you want to kill your kids, that's your own business?". If you can't mandate car seats for kids, can you mandate seat belts for kids?
BTW for those asking, we give away car seats around here. All you have to do is ask for one.
A child cannot make that choice. That aren't old enough.
Why are there always one or two people on these threads who can't tell the difference between "it is a good idea for people to do X" and "it is a good idea for the law to FORCE people to do X"?
12B, it is a Good Idea for people to get a certain amount of exercise each day. Does that mean it should become law, with under-exercisers cited and/or arrested?
Let me know....
In fact, the answer to this question is Yes.
That's the argument of the creeping Nanny State, isn't it. The State has an interest in the well being of children, so it can pass a law that positively impacts their well being.
Which leads to other possibilities: Why doesn't New Jersey pass a law requiring that parents feed their children vegetables at dinner? Everyone knows that kids need vegetables--let's just make it the law.
Why doesn't New Jersey require that children be taken to the zoo once a year? How's this one look:
"WHEREAS, the State of New Jersey finds that the mental, emotional, and psychological well being of children is significantly enhanced by seeing animals at the zoo; and
WHEREAS, the State of New Jersey finds that there are numerous zoos located within the state, with reasonable entry fees and nice snack bars;
NOW, it is hereby enacted that all children shall be taken to the zoo by their parent and/or guardian not less than one (1) time per calendar year, from the age of two years to the age of ten years.
Violation of this statute shall be a Class A misdemeanor."
Hey 12B, got any laws like that in Germany? Should you?
My 7 year old is tall and thin. His hieght makes a Booster or Saftey seat "Unsafe" for him because his ears are above the back of the seat. He also only weighs about 60 Lbs. Now what am I supposed to do when I cross the Bridge into NJ? BTW I do have a belt adjuster in place to keep it down low on his waist and change the cross angle on his chest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.