To: CT
I must disagree. If you say he it is dubious,that means there is some doubt. There is no doubt, no "dubiousness" about it. Clinton is the worst President in the last 100 years if not ever.
2 posted on
10/24/2001 10:30:27 AM PDT by
AUgrad
To: AUgrad
Agreed. History will not look kindly on the grifting 'Toon, despite the Clymers iin the left's best efforts to write a false legacy...
3 posted on
10/24/2001 10:33:43 AM PDT by
eureka!
To: AUgrad
I must disagree. If you say he it is dubious,that means there is some doubt. There is no doubt, no "dubiousness" about it. Clinton is the worst President in the last 100 years if not ever.
Keep in mind, some of these people now telling us Clinton's was a dubious presidency were some of his most ardent supporters the last ten years. The message I am reading is that many are now re-examining their defense of him and stepping further away.
They will never likely be like us in terms of the condemnation. But if they shun him, as they should, he will have no one left to lie to (to coin a Hitchins phrase and book title).
5 posted on
10/24/2001 10:40:22 AM PDT by
CT
To: AUgrad
"without his detractors adding blood splatters"
Sorry - blood splatters was all we had left!!!
77 posted on
10/24/2001 7:38:37 PM PDT by
Sueann
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson