Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov't. Releases Anthrax Guidelines
Associated Press ^ | Oct 25, 2001 | ERIN McCLAM

Posted on 10/25/2001 10:10:47 AM PDT by grimalkin

The government issued specific guidelines Thursday for treating anthrax, providing doctors a list of drugs beyond the sought-after antibiotic Cipro to help fight the infection.

But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which scrambled to publish the guidelines as the nation's bioterrorism toll mounted, warned there are no human studies to back up the recommendations.

The guidelines apply only to confirmed cases of anthrax, not as a precaution for people who may have been exposed.

The CDC advised doctors to treat inhaled anthrax - the deadliest form - with a 60-day regimen starting with intravenous doses of Cipro or doxycycline, supplemented by one or two of seven additional drugs.

Those additional drugs include rifampin, commonly used to treat tuberculosis, and the medical stalwart penicillin. Drugs widely used to combat staph and other respiratory infections were also on the list.

Cipro, marketed by Bayer Corp., has received the most attention as the anthrax investigation has widened. Doses have been dispensed to thousands of people, from postal workers to NBC anchor Tom Brokaw, who may have been exposed to the bacteria.

Six cases of inhaled anthrax have been reported since the nation's mailborne anthrax crisis began. Two postal workers in Washington and a Florida tabloid editor have died.

The treatment guidelines came in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, the health bulletin that clinicians nationwide examine for details on outbreak investigations and guidelines for preventing disease.

"This is the first bioterrorism-related anthrax attack in the United States, and the public health ramifications of this attack continue to evolve," the bulletin cautioned.

For cases of cutaneous anthrax, the skin form of the disease, CDC also recommended 60 days of treatment with Cipro or doxycycline, but said the additional drugs are not necessary.

The same drugs are recommended for treating anthrax in adults and children, the agency said, with much smaller doses for children.

The CDC acknowledged some of the drugs may cause problems for pregnant women but did not alter the recommendations, saying the high death rate for inhalation anthrax far outweighs the risk associated with drugs to treat it.

For the inhalation form of anthrax, the drugs recommended as a supplement to Cipro or doxycycline are:

-Rifampin, also used to treat tuberculosis.

-Vancomycin, also used to treat staph infections.

-Imipenem, used to treat a variety of bacterial infections.

-Chloramphenicol, also used to treat infections that damage the liver.

-Penicillin, also used to treat a broad range of infections, including Lyme disease, tetanus and syphilis.

-Clindamycin, also used to treat acne.

-Clarithromycin, also prescribed to treat bacterial respiratory infections, like strep throat and pneumonia.

---

On the Net:

CDC bioterrorism page: http://www.bt.cdc.gov


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/25/2001 10:10:47 AM PDT by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: grimalkin
Thank you for posting!!
3 posted on 10/25/2001 10:31:30 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin; *Anthrax_Scare_List
Excellent and thanks for posting this information.

To find all articles tagged or indexed using

Anthrax_Scare_List

Go here:

OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC) LIST

and then click the Anthrax_Scare_List topic to initiate the search! !

4 posted on 10/25/2001 10:48:51 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
I was wondering about something. If somebody contracts anthrax do they also aquire an immunity to it? Or if they are exposed again is it another 60 day cycle?
5 posted on 10/25/2001 11:20:37 AM PDT by jhasslen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which scrambled to publish the guidelines as the nation's bioterrorism toll mounted, warned there are no human studies to back up the recommendations.

The guidelines apply only to confirmed cases of anthrax, not as a precaution for people who may have been exposed.

...

Cipro, marketed by Bayer Corp., has received the most attention as the anthrax investigation has widened. Doses have been dispensed to thousands of people, from postal workers to NBC anchor Tom Brokaw, who may have been exposed to the bacteria.

First, they admit to no human studies.

Second, they advise treatment only in diagnosed cases.

Third, Cipro is being used to treat thousands of people (I just read ten thousand) right now. Yet I keep hearing major media say only a few have been infected. Is the government ignoring its own guidelines or are we being lied to about the number of cases? Of course I realize it could be both.

6 posted on 10/25/2001 11:24:21 AM PDT by UnBlinkingEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhasslen
Obviously the problem here with anthrax exposure and infection is that the early symtoms go undiagnosed. What, pray tell, are the symptoms before it's too late! Freepers should be able to track this down with expert testimony such as what was the progression of the symtoms of the people who have actually now been confirmed, from the onset of exposure to clinical expressions of infection? ie some people got sick and were not treated properly others were.
7 posted on 10/25/2001 11:31:35 AM PDT by The Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Bolt
Symptoms Here
8 posted on 10/25/2001 11:57:15 AM PDT by Iam4theRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: UnBlinkingEye
First, they admit to no human studies.

Cipro has been given to more than 100 million people since 1987. Last year in July, Cipro became and still remains the only drug approved by the FDA for inhalational anthrax.

Penicillin the number one antibiotic in the world, has actually treated more anthrax than Cipro, but because the drug is now not owned by any one drug company, none brought it to the FDA for approval. Merck provides guidelines for penicillin therapy for both types of anthrax, based upon years of history of treatment on humans.

9 posted on 10/25/2001 1:46:38 PM PDT by scottiewottie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scottiewottie
Cipro has been given to more than 100 million people since 1987. Last year in July, Cipro became and still remains the only drug approved by the FDA for inhalational anthrax.

The line I quoted in my prior response came from the CDC not the FDA per the article. My main question is why the CDC is advising not using antibiotics unless a positive test for the infection has occurred, yet ten thousand people are being treated with Cipro, et al, for potential anthrax exposure without any positive test?

10 posted on 10/25/2001 2:00:53 PM PDT by UnBlinkingEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: scottiewottie
I stand corrected! October 17th, the FDA was brave enough to declare that another generic drug doxycycline, has now suddenly appeared on the official blessings list. This blessing came after it was clear that Bayer could not keep up with demand. But Bayer puts on a happy face and says they are greatful!
11 posted on 10/25/2001 2:17:21 PM PDT by scottiewottie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: UnBlinkingEye
One good reason is that the cure could be more deadly than the disease. Many people die every year from the use of antibiotics. Same with a smallox vaccine, the vaccine if administered to 100 million people will result in according to some 10,000 deaths and even more permanent injuries.

Supply, profiteering, and panic are the other reasons. But prescription drugs do kill and should not be taken unless you have good reason.

12 posted on 10/25/2001 2:26:20 PM PDT by scottiewottie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
.
13 posted on 10/25/2001 2:27:12 PM PDT by snippy_about_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Bolt
Obviously the problem here with anthrax exposure and infection is that the early symtoms go undiagnosed. What, pray tell, are the symptoms before it's too late!

Same as the common cold. We are entering the season of colds and flu. The anthrax has been specially treated to stay in the air as an aerosol, and sized to enter the lungs to cause pulmonary anthrax, the least-treatable form. Treatment of pulmonary anthrax is largely ineffective unless you know you are at risk before you get the symptoms. It will be quite easy for the terrorists to inflict many thousands of casualties through serruptitious aerosol dispersal of the material they have so far only sent in powder form, accompanied by a warning notes. If they also have antibiotic-resistant strains, which is perfectly possible, figure hundreds of thousands to millions of casualties. All Saddam has to do is give the word.

Now, do we really want to hit Saddam?

14 posted on 10/25/2001 2:34:44 PM PDT by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jhasslen
Anthrax is a bacteria not a virus. You never gain immunity from a bacterial infection. Each exposure has to be treated.
15 posted on 10/25/2001 2:53:37 PM PDT by Procyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Bolt; Clinton's a rapist
My proxy software would not permit me to respond to "Clinton's a rapist". So here it goes. This article affirm what you said, very chilling.

"....That such methods of biological weapons delivery are increasingly seen as practical is underlined by a recent CIA report into Iraq's pre-1991 CBW programme, which noted that:

Iraq worked to adapt a modified aircraft drop tank for biological agent spray operations beginning in December 1990. The tank could be attached either to a piloted fighter or to a remotely piloted aircraft that would be guided to the target by another, piloted aircraft. The tank was designed to spray up to 2,000 litres of anthrax on a target.

Article here

16 posted on 10/25/2001 2:55:18 PM PDT by scottiewottie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Procyon
Oh but the military tried!

"No, you STILL don't want the anthrax vaccine. Here's why."

try also www.anthraxvaccine.org

17 posted on 10/25/2001 3:17:46 PM PDT by scottiewottie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
bttt
18 posted on 10/25/2001 3:18:43 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson