I'm surprised ACLU is opposed. Seems like so many of these security ideas coming into play are not going to work, as stated, only "give a false sense of security". I was uncomfortable when the bank wanted to take my pic for the files, supposedly for security reasons. What do YOU think about this face-scanning stuff?
1 posted on
10/25/2001 3:15:51 PM PDT by
maggie
To: maggie
What do YOU think about this face-scanning stuff?
Booooooooo!!!!!
I'll never set foot or spend money there ever again, nor in Tampa's Ybor City for the same reason. I hope others do the same, and I hope the airline's stockholders get very, very angry.
3 posted on
10/25/2001 3:22:38 PM PDT by
freeeee
To: maggie
Boston's Airport to Test Face-Scanning CamerasRun Hillary, Madeline Albright and Janet Reno past them. See if the lens can withstand the strain...
4 posted on
10/25/2001 3:23:43 PM PDT by
dirtboy
To: maggie; snopercod
The American Civil Liberties Union ... is intrusive and may not even work well under certain conditions, such as dim lighting...
To: maggie; snopercod
There should have long ago been cameras aboard the airplanes so that the flight deck can see "what is going on back there."
Also, there should be cameras recording the passengers going aboard, right at the hatches.
To: maggie
I bought Viisage Technology Inc two weeks ago.
It jumped up 12% today.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson