Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Redundant incompetence: Jon Dougherty advises more bureaucracy will not protect America
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, October 26, 2001 | Jon Dougherty

Posted on 10/26/2001 1:30:53 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

WND Exclusive Commentary
Redundant incompetence


© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

Most of us cannot envision a life without bureaucracy – those inefficient, cumbersome, lethargic tax-supported entities that, were they businesses, would have folded long ago, their managers jailed on charges of fraud, theft and breathing valuable air.

We cannot envision a life without bureaucracy because over the years we have allowed our leaders to create so damned much of it. We have agencies for everything, and most of what our national leaders have created, our state and local leaders have duplicated.

So, we not only have bureaucracy, baby, we have redundant bureaucracy. Are we really stupid, or what?

With this in mind, it really bothers me that we're allowing our leaders to create even more bureaucracy now, as we face a new and very real terrorist threat. If anything, Americans need more decisions being made by less people – or, at a minimum, accountable people – at this time in our history than at any time in our past.

With more bureaucracy in the form of Gov. Tom Ridge's newly created Homeland Security agency, the people get neither accountability nor a reduction in the number of decision makers.

No one knows the futility of more bureaucracy better than a "recovering" bureaucrat.

On Monday former Deputy FBI Director Oliver "Buck" Revell told the Press Club of Dallas the U.S. could never have stopped the Sept. 11 attacks because "we were deaf, dumb and blind … we were asleep at the switch."

Revell said terrorist dangers had been spelled out to Congress and various commissions many times during the Clinton administration. But because our nation was (and is) too top-heavy and too dependent on the chronic inefficiency of its own bureaucracy, boom! We became victims instead.

So much for the hundred billion or so dollars taxpayers coughed up last year to fund all of these agencies tasked with some degree of national security.

Oh – and so much for holding anyone accountable for this incredible security failure. Instead of asking for more power to violate the civil rights of innocent people, why the hell isn't Attorney General John Ashcroft arresting people who failed to do their jobs to protect this country?

"… Nothing's been done to put together a coherent homeland defense," Revell said. "There is no strategic planning, shared mission or coordination" among agencies dealing with global, organized crime and terrorist activities.

No foolin'.

Over 140 agencies under 14 Cabinet heads are responsible for some aspect of homeland defense. That is just too much bureaucracy. Nobody knows what everyone else is doing. And in the few instances where people have tried to find out, testosterone gets in the way and agencies actually withheld information from each other, just to protect their stupid turf and preserve their position at the federal (read taxpayer) funding trough.

With that kind of bureaucracy, Cabinet heads are wearing so freaking many hats there is no possible way they can effectively manage all the duties they are assigned.

So what was the "solution" of the Bush White House to address this terrorist "problem" of ours? What was Congress' answer? Well, let's just create a brand-new agency and staff it with a new Cabinet-level chief.

Yeah, that'll work.

"It doesn't matter how many homeland czars we have," Revell said, noting that if there is no "political will" or "public attention … for more than 24 hours," this new bureaucracy is only going to perform as well as – well, our old bureaucracies.

That's just swell. How in the world can a nation achieve the pinnacle of global success America has achieved and be so self-destructive at the same time?

All this bureaucracy is killing us, folks. We no longer have leaders to choose from on election day – just corporate paper-shufflers, "personnel managers" and carpetbaggers who are much better at shirking a duty than taking one on. We are no longer electing representatives, senators and presidents – just figureheads who manage and fund bureaucracies.

The United States government is now our largest employer, ladies and gentlemen. Add to those numbers the numbers of men and women who work for state and local governments. Enough said.

And you wonder how in the world "them damned terrorists" could have killed almost 7,000 people Sept. 11?

I don't. I don't wonder at all.


Related offer:

Think every vote counts? Think again. Get Jon E. Dougherty's report, "Election 2000: How the military vote was suppressed," in WorldNetDaily's online store.

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/26/2001 1:30:53 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


2 posted on 10/26/2001 1:34:27 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Close but no cigar.

Yes, Washington is awash in multiple federal agencies. You name it and every letter of the alphabet has probably been used at least once if not dozens of times. And just like we found out when our troops went into Grenada, none of them have the capability of talking to each other.

This position actually makes sense, much sense. It will coordinate the intelligence and resources of all those agencies the otherwise would not happen. For once added bureaucracy makes some sense.

3 posted on 10/26/2001 1:38:56 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
JD is dead on with this one. The answer is not more layers of federal bureaucracy. We need a streamlining of agencies that are involved in what we now call 'homeland defense.' Unless and until organizations such as FBI, FEMA, ATF, INS, Coast Guard and National Guard Bureau in peacetime, and others are pulled out by the roots (budget and all) from their current departments and placed directly under the Department of Home Land Defense, we will continue to suffer the 'finger-pointing' confusion that now exists.
4 posted on 10/26/2001 1:58:43 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Come on, Chief, I want to hear more about your analysis on why we need a bigger central government and even more confusing lines of control. Remember that it's not about coordination between agencies, administrations, bureaus, etc., but rather who controls the purse strings. The FBI is already stiffing Ridge on cooperation. It will only get worse unless congress forces the necessary realignment.
5 posted on 10/26/2001 2:38:20 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

bump
6 posted on 10/26/2001 4:08:31 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
It's all about un-confusing the lines of control. Before there was none between agencies, there will be now.
7 posted on 10/26/2001 10:50:52 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson; leadpenny
Yup, Just like Al Gore re-invented government.

We are all New Democrats, Now.

8 posted on 10/26/2001 10:56:29 AM PDT by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
It's all about un-confusing the lines of control. Before there was none between agencies, there will be now.

-------------------------------------

--- "un-confusing the lines of control" ---, hmmmmm, I didn't know they spoke bureaucrateze at Jack in the Box. - Maybe you did push a desk in the service.

9 posted on 10/26/2001 11:04:16 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
This position actually makes sense, much sense.

The only position which makes sense to you is bent over. Tell me ONE THING that the federal government does well?.

---max

10 posted on 10/26/2001 11:35:10 AM PDT by max61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: max61
Bent over? You sure do keep getting me mixed up with your mother an awful lot.
11 posted on 10/26/2001 12:08:19 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Naw, I avoid desks. You never knew when you would find someone like you under them. That's not for me thanks.
12 posted on 10/26/2001 12:09:42 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
It's all about un-confusing the lines of control. Before there was none between agencies, there will be now.

Ok. You might want to take another shot at it because, quite frankly, I don't think those two sentences made sense to anyone. I was really looking for some critical analysis of the aritcle and, specifically, of my comments at 4 and 5. How did we get to bending over tables and the like?

13 posted on 10/26/2001 3:36:31 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt; tpaine; max61
Bar fight is over. You all can come back now. For a moment I thought Seinfeld had come on early this evening. LOL
14 posted on 10/26/2001 3:41:09 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
The bar fight is never over for Jumping Jack wannabes. His only purpose here, or on all his old anti-freeper haunts, was self puffery. Sad, weird sorta fella.
15 posted on 10/26/2001 3:56:57 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Wrong still tpaine, I hang around just to remind you how politically impotent you are. Kind of like your politics immitating life.
16 posted on 10/26/2001 7:43:42 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Hmmm, did I ever make any claims of being politically effective? -- Nope.

But never fear, I noted your sly dig on 'potency'. Having problems that way, are you? -- That, plus your frequent references to your imagined foes mothers, leads me to believe you are one sick puppy. Find help.

17 posted on 10/26/2001 8:01:24 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
You can only imagine a mother...how sad. As for being a foe, you highly overrate yourself. You're almost on the same par as a mosquito, only not quite as intelligent.
18 posted on 10/26/2001 11:45:49 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson