under a different name, perhaps. I don't think we've met under your current moniker.
1) the US military is targeting civilians, aiming with deadly accuracy to kill women, children and the elderly.
If so, they are playing a dangerous game. We are currently depending on other Muslim nations like Pakistan who will withdraw support if you are correct.
2) When not killing innocent civilians, the US kills UN and Red Cross workers.
And 10 soldiers from our ally, the Northern Alliance.
3) When not bombing women, children, the elderly and UN workers, the US bombs mosques and schools.
While Rumsfeld admits that the alleged target of this whole operation probably will not be caught.
4) Despite killing “thousands” of men, women, children, clerics, UN workers and students, the US has not managed to kill any Taliban fighters.
Now that you bring it up, the operation so far has been less than successful.
Perhaps, Ada Dear, you would like to explain this method of war fighting for us? By the way are there any non-civilians in Afghanistan that we may have hit, just as collateral damage in our attack on the civilian population[sarcasm off]
If we are targetting civilians like we did in Kossovo, the object the same as it was there.
I believe I saw you at the entrance to the downtown tunnel with the other church ladies holding up a "Peace Now" sign.
That's me. I'll continue to hold it until the U.S. government targets those responsible for the 911 attack. Let me know if we ever get serious about holding the proper parties responsible.
[you replied]If so, they are playing a dangerous game. We are currently depending on other Muslim nations like Pakistan who will withdraw support if you are correct."
I feel like Johnathan Swift who, when he satirically recommended eating Irish children, was sent a recipe for stewing them.
You have a seriously disturbed mind.