Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANN COULTER: THE EUNUCHS ARE WHINING
Yahoo! ^ | 10/31/2001 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 10/31/2001 6:37:34 PM PST by Pokey78

We've finally given liberals a war against fundamentalism, and they don't want to fight it. They would, except it would put them on the same side as the United States.

With the media suffering from fainting spells, the country is being run by people who can splice cables and land jets on ships in the dark of night. These are men, a subspecies of Americans heretofore invisible to the elites. But now the elites are complaining that the men aren't working fast enough.

Not exactly smashing stereotypes of liberals as mincing pantywaists, the left's entire contribution to the war effort thus far has been to whine. In lieu of a military response against terrorists abroad and security precautions at home, liberals would like to get the whole thing over with and just throw Jerry Falwell in jail.

Walter Cronkite, better known as president of the Ho Chi Minh Veneration Society, has compared the Rev. Falwell to the Taliban. In response to Falwell's comment that gay marriage and abortion on demand may not have warmed the heart of the Almighty, Cronkite proclaimed it "the most abominable thing I've ever heard."

Showing the dispassion and critical judgment that earned him the moniker "the most pious blowhard in America," this self-serving, multimillionaire Martha's Vineyard boob accused Falwell of "worshipping the same God as the people who bombed the Trade Center and the Pentagon (news - web sites)."

Liberals compare Jerry Falwell to the Taliban, but then are furious with George Bush for not being Jesus Christ. Evidently, what a president is supposed to do when the girls are scared is develop complete omniscience and omnipotence. Thus, the media repeatedly expound upon the proposition that what Bush should have done in response to the anthrax mailings is: Instantly produce the culprits and put an end to this madness!

The New York Times has been issuing daily harangues on this point. The cover story of last Sunday's Week in Review section ("Efforts to Calm the Nation's Fears Spin Out of Control") lectured Bush: "People in the grip of fear want information that holds up, not spin control."

Men are out in the driving rain trying to change a tire, while the womenfolk sit in a warm roadside cafe demanding to know what's taking so long. Just pipe down! The men are working as fast as they can.

In fact, no one is in the "grip of fear" over anthrax except the media and their most gullible targets, liberal women. Liberal soccer moms are precisely as likely to receive anthrax in the mail as to develop a capacity for linear thinking. But the media are working overtime to create a Princess Di-like hysteria in Manhattan suburbs.

Every death, including the thousands murdered in the womb every day, is sad. But let's not forget that the mass mailing of anthrax spores has killed only four people so far. These are tragic occurrences, as are the deaths from car accidents, drowning and fire since the attack. So far the anthrax mailings don't hold a candle to the slaughter of 9-11.

But the Times is furious with Bush every single moment he delays in bringing back the halcyon days when liberals could attend Calvin Klein fashion shows free of anxiety. "Again and again in recent weeks, administration officials tried to reassure the public; again and again, the situation proved more serious than the officials had suggested."

It seems that a more soothing response to a bio-terrorism scare would be for the administration to have God-like omniscience about the anthrax mailings, including predicting all future mailings.

Frank "No, No, Nanette!" Rich recently emitted an interminable screech on the op-ed page of The New York Times denouncing the Bush administration for not solving the anthrax cases already: "The most highly trumpeted breakthrough in the hunt for anthrax terrorists -- Tom Ridge's announcement that 'the site where the letters were mailed' had been found in New Jersey -- proved a dead end."

As Irish playwright Brendan Behan said: "Critics are like eunuchs in a harem: They know how it's done, they've seen it done every day, but they're unable to do it themselves." (It's no surprise Rich is afraid of the mail: He's afraid of me. Just last night he refused to be in the "Politically Incorrect" greenroom with me.)

Go listen to a Rodgers and Hammerstein sound track and try to stay calm, Frank. Patriotic Americans are doing their best to protect theater critics quaking in their Upper West Side redoubts.

Maureen Dowd, another hysterical Times columnist, is still indignant that George Bush wouldn't have asked her to the prom. "Polo at Yale is a bit different than the Afghan version," she sniffed. Three weeks into the war and she's already calling it "Operation Quagmire."

Women -- and I don't mean to limit that to the biological sense -- always become hysterical at the first sign of trouble. They have no capacity to solve problems, so instead they fret. But despite the fearful fifth columnists whiling away the war naysaying America's response, we will win this war.

You just stay warm, girls; the men are fixing the car.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coulter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last
To: Pokey78
This Ann is HOT!!!

Too HOT for the leftist to handle! Too HOT for the girly-boys at the National Review to handle!

She is SOOO HOT my testosterone level has risen to dangerous levels.

101 posted on 11/01/2001 7:57:00 AM PST by kapn kuek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I'm emailing this one to a couple of liberal, NPR-listening coworkers who are wondering aloud if this isn't just another case of "U.S. imperialism." They've forgotten WTC altogether - they have to, otherwise our actions don't fit into their tidy little mental model of the world.

I've said it on other threads, and I have to admit it's starting to get to me - if you want to read ANY anti-Taliban statement, ANY critique of the Al Q'eda murderers, ANY praise of U.S. military personnel, you have to go to the foreign press, and I think that is utterly disgusting.

102 posted on 11/01/2001 7:57:03 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Amen Annie.
103 posted on 11/01/2001 8:05:32 AM PST by lds23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Women -- and I don't mean to limit that to the biological sense -- always become hysterical at the first sign of trouble.

Ouch! Another 'girlyboy' jab, this time directed at the Liberal Media Men.

104 posted on 11/01/2001 8:07:32 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
bttt
105 posted on 11/01/2001 8:18:08 AM PST by Tennessean4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; ~EagleNebula~
This was so good, I had to come back and read it again...

;-)

106 posted on 11/01/2001 8:28:49 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
What's with the Jay bashing? Lumping Jay in the same crowd as Maureen Dowd is QUITE a stretch.
107 posted on 11/01/2001 8:39:48 AM PST by patfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Well, I did email it to my most liberal friend. You should have heard the screams! God, it was sweet...BTT. I haven't had that much fun in a long, long time.
108 posted on 11/01/2001 8:46:54 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
A decent rant, but not much better than most experienced FReepers could belt out if they took all day to write the post.

AC seems to be able to sing only one note - "All liberals are sissies. Anybody who disagrees with me is a sissy." It was stale two years ago. It's as dry as dust today.

109 posted on 11/01/2001 8:59:02 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I love Ann Coulter (and not just for this article) BTTT!
110 posted on 11/01/2001 9:08:25 AM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
http://images.google.com/ .......is where I got them from.
111 posted on 11/01/2001 9:28:21 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Is Bill still hosting? Think I'll pass...
112 posted on 11/01/2001 10:11:01 AM PST by snorkeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: snorkeler
Watch him while you can. It's not often he attacks liberals.
113 posted on 11/01/2001 10:17:24 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Oh, gotcha. I thought there might have been some way to display jpg and gifs as thumbnails.

Thanks anyway.
114 posted on 11/01/2001 10:18:12 AM PST by jjbrouwer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
.....I am completely in awe of this passage...

Likewise

Doc

115 posted on 11/01/2001 5:32:12 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: patfan
What's with the Jay bashing? Lumping Jay in the same crowd as Maureen Dowd is QUITE a stretch.

Not to me. They're both elitist windbags with more than their share of hubris.

116 posted on 11/01/2001 5:57:23 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Silly
LOL Cool pic!
117 posted on 11/01/2001 7:19:04 PM PST by ~EagleNebula~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
Awe! who p*ssed in your cheerios this morning? It was an excellent article, and well put!

Jealous, maybe?

Ann, you go girl!! and, for the record, if I could get the stupid spare tire loose from under the van, I would be out there changing it!!!! LOL

Keep writing, Ann! You have a great way with words, and a talent at putting it all together. There are many who wish they could write like you! HATS OFF TO YA!

118 posted on 11/01/2001 7:28:44 PM PST by ~EagleNebula~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; The Shrew
EV, thanks! TS, PING! This is a MUST read!
119 posted on 11/01/2001 7:30:42 PM PST by ~EagleNebula~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Fantastic article as always by Ann!

Am I the only one bothered by the NYT admonishment to Bush that people in the grip of fear want information that holds up, not spin control? Please, these are the same people who defended the Clinton/Gore regime who were always spinning so much they looked like tops?

120 posted on 11/01/2001 7:42:43 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson