Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government asks court to consider Sept. 11 in professor's case [Re: accused USF Professor Al-Najja]
AP, via The Naples Daily News ^ | Nov. 2, 2001 | Vickie Chachere

Posted on 11/02/2001 4:42:25 AM PST by summer

Government asks court to consider Sept. 11 in professor's case

Friday, November 2, 2001

By VICKIE CHACHERE, Associated Press

TAMPA — The U.S. Justice Department is asking a federal appeals court to consider the Sept. 11 attacks when it hears the case of a professor accused of supporting terrorist groups.

The government is not alleging Mazen Al-Najjar is connected to the attacks on New York and Washington. Al-Najjar spent more than three years detained as a threat to national security although he was never charged with a crime.

In filings to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal in Miami earlier this week, the U.S. Department of Justice references the attacks, noting recent Congressional action shows a "deference owed the Executive Branch in national security determinations and the paramount nature of this government interest."

The government will argue Nov. 8 in Miami for the appeals court to reverse a lower court's ruling that Al-Najjar's rights were violated by the use of secret evidence. That decision led to his release in December.

The Justice Department did not return calls for comment Thursday.

David Cole, who heads Al-Najjar's legal team, said it appears the government now sees the case as crucial in the intensified fight against terrorism.

The case could have implications for hundreds of immigrants who have been detained in the wake of the attacks and in the government's ongoing investigation of suspected terrorists in the United States, Cole said.


"They have a broader interest in asserting they have the constitutional authority to lock people up without showing them the evidence that supports their detention," Cole said.

"We believe their trying to address the court with the events of Sept. 11 is inflammatory and has nothing to do with the legal issues at hand," said Martin Schwartz, Al-Najjar's Tampa attorney. "It's not relevant."

Al-Najjar helped run a University of South Florida Islamic studies group and a Palestinian charity in the early 1990s. Later, the groups were connected to men involved with terrorist groups.

Al-Najjar and the groups' founder, Sami Al-Arian, have denied any ties to terrorists and have condemned the Sept. 11 attacks. They say their groups existed only to foster understanding of Middle East issues and to help care for Palestinian orphans.

The groups were disbanded following FBI raids in 1995. Two years later, Al-Najjar was detained on a visa violation, but the government blocked his request for bond saying he was a security risk.

Last year, U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard decided the Immigration and Naturalization Service violated Al-Najjar constitutional rights and ordered the immigration judge to review the case again.

In December, the immigration judge said there was not enough evidence to continue holding Al-Najjar's and then-Attorney General Janet Reno allowed his release.

Schwartz said he believes the government is trying to argue it should be allowed to use secret evidence in light of the recent attacks.

Al-Najjar and his wife, who have three American-born daughters, continue to fight their deportation. This week, the 11th Circuit denied their request for a rehearing, but attorneys said their are still other avenues for appeal, including a request the U.S. Supreme Court take the case.

Last month, Al-Arian was placed on indefinite, paid leave by USF officials who said his presence on campus in the wake of the attacks is a safety risk.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alarian; alnajjar; florida; usf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
FYI.
1 posted on 11/02/2001 4:42:25 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
FYI.
2 posted on 11/02/2001 4:46:38 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurkysis
FYI.

I'm watching this case, and I hope this professor gets deported ASAP.
3 posted on 11/02/2001 4:49:13 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne; bosniajmc
FYI.
4 posted on 11/02/2001 4:55:27 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: summer
This dirty bastard should have an accident - real soon.
5 posted on 11/02/2001 4:55:41 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
The sooner the congress agrees to declare WAR and not leave the country in this limbo of protecting the enemy, the better. Call your elected today!
6 posted on 11/02/2001 4:59:29 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
Is this the idiot who went on O'Rielly and denied nothing?
7 posted on 11/02/2001 5:04:03 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Sammi Al-Arian is the one who was on O'Reilly. I hope they get him out of here too. He has only been suspended from the University, there are no charges against him. He needs to go.
8 posted on 11/02/2001 5:10:03 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: summer
"Last year, U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard ..."

Is this one of the 83 judges that Clinton hired after firing 83 sitting judges upon his election?

9 posted on 11/02/2001 5:29:36 AM PST by tomball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball
" Al-Najjar spent more than three years detained as a threat to national security although he was never charged with a crime. "

Says it all. People can be held indefinitely with being charged.

10 posted on 11/02/2001 5:41:49 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
I think you meant to write: without being charged.

However, since the government is now appealing, it sounds like they actually had reasons and evidence for detaining him, but such has not been made public because of a potential threat to national security. I am just surmising here. It disturbs me too when people are detained without being charged with a crime. But, in this case, I don't think we've heard the whole story -- yet.
11 posted on 11/02/2001 6:38:28 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: summer
You're right. It's without being charged. Three years isn't a "speedy trial" in my opinion. Centuries ago in England, criticism of the King was considered a national security problem.
12 posted on 11/02/2001 6:51:35 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
I agree, three years is not "speedy" -- but, as I said, who knows what evidence they have on this professor. What if they do have something very damaging? I too feel they should have done something by now by now with it, but again, I am not certain we know the whole story.
13 posted on 11/02/2001 7:07:46 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
something by now by now with it, = something by now with it,
14 posted on 11/02/2001 7:08:31 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
I think that this was a little more than "crticism of the king".

We are at war, and different rules apply (if we want to survive).

Moslem arab foreigners particularly need special handling.


15 posted on 11/02/2001 7:10:17 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
So if you have proof that the guy being held for three years with charge actually helped in the plane attacks, just show it.
16 posted on 11/02/2001 7:21:04 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Travis, I'm glad you posted that photo. Thanks. I'm sure there is someone out there who needs to be reminded.
17 posted on 11/02/2001 7:23:06 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic; summer

WE ARE AT WAR!

Is that a very difficult concept for you?

18 posted on 11/02/2001 7:31:42 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Did you support indicting only the specific pilots which it could be proved in court actually dropped the bombs on Pearl Harbor?
19 posted on 11/02/2001 7:33:16 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Thanks again. Keep those photos handy. You may need to post them all over the place in the future, as this war continues, as it surely will.
20 posted on 11/02/2001 7:44:19 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson