This is your view, and I respectfully disagree, mainly on operational grounds. Unless you want to turn the US into a locked-up isolationist police state there will always be a way for terrorists to infiltrate if they really want to. It's part of the price of freedom. You may be willing to pay the price necessary for total security, I am not, and I think we should just leave it at that.
Like the over-educated psychobabblers at the CFR you like to offer false solutions that would turn America in a police state. And you attribute to me a wanting for a police state of "total security" at the expense of the citizens giving up all their rights to achieve this false security. However this false argument doesn't work in fooling people, as I have openly advocated on numerous threads of mine and others that the American people not give up any of their freedoms or rights to stop terrorism. I have only advocated that illegals and terror linked individuals be arrested and/or deported (as applicable) through existing Constitutional laws on immigration(not any new ones). And I certainly have never advocated any disgrace so-called anti-terrorism (rights usurping) laws as was recently passed. To the contrary I firmly opposed it, as I did the last so-called anti-terrorism law that was achieved & passed after the Oklahoma bombing. Also to the contrary I propose expanding the American people's (defacto) rights by repealing the evil 1968 Gun Control Act which disarmed our pilots so terrorism could easily occur. The evil 1968 Gun control Act also caused the general population in most states to be publicly disarmed to a large extent and greatly increased crime.
And you pretend that enforcing our immigration and deportation laws would some ghow created a police state, when you know in reality that our government is porposefully not enforcing the law and deporting millions of illegal aliens!
Do you deny that our government is not enforcing the deportation of illegals even though it is required by law?