Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is This Gay Behavior Sick?
Too Good Reports ^ | November 21, 2001 | Henry Makow Ph.D.

Posted on 11/21/2001 6:50:27 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-270 next last
To: GW in Ohio
I'll take my "crappy" religion thank you very much. I'll take absolutes over the wishy-washy watered down crap you are peddling. I want to depend on moral ground... I want right from wrong... I want to know how to base my decisions and not be tossed about by whatever wind happens to blow at the time.

To be quite frank... I am more anti-homosexual now with all that's going on now than ever before. I was much more "tolerant"... but now, no way. What you propose as a free society is much more represive than the theocracy I live by.

Some people are attracted to children too... and have been persecuted down through the ages as well... are we a repressive theocracy to deny them the right to persue their pleasures as well?
241 posted on 12/02/2002 10:55:40 AM PST by myrabach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: GW in Ohio
Just about every reputable psychologist in the world disagrees with the assumption that homosexuality is a perversion.

I think you mean to say that they disagree with the notion that homosexuality is a mental illness; even then, it is much the same as saying:

"Just about every reputable educator in the world thinks that teachers are overpaid," group-think probably afflicts the psychological community more than any other group (IMO).

242 posted on 12/02/2002 4:10:31 PM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Gays have on average almost 10 sex partners every year and are lucky if they really know one of their names beforehand.

What do they do the other 51 weeks?

243 posted on 12/02/2002 4:14:54 PM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ideablitz
Individual has to either adopt or discover his/her own value.

Man, you are illiterate.

244 posted on 12/02/2002 4:24:09 PM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GW in Ohio
Let's just be grateful that the RC Church no longer holds unquestioned hegemony over all of Western civilization.

Actually, if people were to follow the teachings of the Catholic Church, we would have no AIDs crisis at all, we would not have 65 million Americans with STDs, we would not have over a million abortions a year, we would not have 1/2 of all American children born out of wedlock, we would not have 1/3 of all pregnancies ended in abortion. For myself personally, I know that I will never get an STD, that I will never get AIDs (baring the most unlikely of circumstances), that my children will always have a married and loving mother and father, and that any child that I have helped to conceive will not be brutally murdered. I'll take the Catholic Church's teaching over the 'wisdom' of Western civilization any day.

245 posted on 12/02/2002 6:39:32 PM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GW in Ohio
My point is that we're debunking these old taboos about sex, one after another. (Or maybe you still think sex should only be for procreation?) The old taboo against homosexuality is still holding on stubbornly, but it too will go soon.

You're wrong. Men putting their sexual organs up the rectums of other men will never be considered healthy, normal, good or positive by most people. Most people see it for the filthy, sorry and disgusting act that it is.

246 posted on 12/02/2002 6:43:26 PM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
The words "sacred" and "fun" should not be used in the same sentence, except to produce hilarious results. One completely cancels out the other.

You're wrong, Biker NYC. Sex with my wife is fun and sacred at the same time. My three beautiful children were brought into this world from that sacred and fun act with my wife.

247 posted on 12/02/2002 6:45:32 PM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
BTTT
248 posted on 12/16/2002 7:13:31 AM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
“Relationships between gay men don´t usually last very long.” They quickly tire of their partners and fall victim to temptation. The “cheating ratio of ‘married´ gay males, given enough time, approaches 100%.”

That's becuase our repressive, homophobic society won't let them marry, right?


249 posted on 12/16/2002 7:19:01 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
Thanks.
250 posted on 12/16/2002 7:19:42 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Women find most gay men attractive.. Men find most gay women unattractive (including wannabe Ann Heche). Whats up with that?

A guess. More gay men than straight men look after themselves and straight women like the look of that; while gay women tend not to be caught up with the "looks" thing and straight men are all about the "looks" thing.
251 posted on 12/16/2002 7:21:40 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Few people are more self-righteous than the defenders of homosexual perversions. Their capacity for long-suffering tolerance and acceptance is truly on the level of deity. After all, any normal human being can detest pathologically sick sexual behavior. It takes someone better than an average human being to embrace and even celebrate dysfnctional, life-shortening, disease-spreading, sepetic sexual behaviors. It takes a god.

Just ask the defenders of the gay lifestyle. Well, you don't even have to ask them. They'll use a megaphone to tell you without being prompted.

252 posted on 12/16/2002 7:29:43 AM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Here's how "normal" the homosexuals have made their "deathstyle" here.

For your consideration, edification (and violent regurgitation!), we present the newest PC BSA Merit Badge:

The proposed RIMMING, SNORKLING and GERBIL STUFFING badges are still being designed and will be -- er -- OUT soon.

253 posted on 12/16/2002 7:35:06 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GW in Ohio
You can only define homosexual behavior as "deviant" if you also define any sexual activity that isn't aimed at producing children as deviant.

Which is precisely the truth. The reproductive function is integral to the sexual act. Any sexual act that subverts the reproductive aspect of intercourse is by defiition disordered and immoral.

There are many sexual activities engaged in by men and women that aren't directed toward impregnantion. Sex between two men or sex between two women is simply one of those non-reproductive sexual activities.

Trying to separate reproduction from sexual relations is like trying to separate nutrition from the act of eating: a perversion of the natural order.

A lot of the prejudice against gays originated in Biblical times, when it was imperative to be fruitful and multiply in order to ensure the survival of the tribe, or the species. Any activity that didn't lead to reproduction was bad, because it didn't contribute to the survival of the group.

Uh, sure, Perfesser. Thanks for that utterly unupported personal opinion.

These days, when we have too many people crowding the earth...

Another unsupported assertion. Who says we have too many people crowding the earth?

...those old taboos against non-reproductive sex have fallen, one after another. The Catholic Church is one of the last holdouts for the "be fruitful and multiply" point of view in the modern world.

The Catholic Church supports human life in all its forms. We are 100% in favor of human beings, and we always will be, no matter what a "majority of reputable psychologists" say.

The Church still officially forbids any kind of birth control, including contraceptives, doesn't it?

Since the reproductive function is integral to the sexual act, and since any sexual act that subverts the reproductive aspect of intercourse is disordered and immoral, then, yes, the Church forbids artificial contraception.

"Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,[Cf. Gen 191-29; Rom 124-27; 1 Cor 6:10; 1 Tim 1:10 .] tradition has always declared that 'homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.' [CDF, Persona humana 8.] They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved."

254 posted on 12/16/2002 7:55:04 AM PST by B-Chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Slam dunk, Rommie. The dubious "progress" of the humanistic, atheistic Revolution can be measured in heaps of bodies and gallons of tears. Modernisme? Merci, non. I'll take the Catholic Church, in all its "backwards" glory.

By the way: thanks for helping out Captain Picard!

255 posted on 12/16/2002 7:59:02 AM PST by B-Chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry; scripter
Bump & Ping
256 posted on 12/16/2002 8:08:06 AM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Yuk! Now that’s really SICK behavior.
257 posted on 12/16/2002 8:27:37 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Hey, I'm just the messenger!

It's WHAT THESE FOLKS DO!!

258 posted on 12/16/2002 8:29:49 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
Any sexual act that subverts the reproductive aspect of intercourse is by definition disordered and immoral.

Exactly! That’s why what happens between a man and woman has no relation to the practice of homosexuality. Obviously the only thing those who pretend an anus is a vagina can produce are dirt babies.

259 posted on 12/16/2002 8:32:59 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: GW in Ohio
Either we're a free society or we are a repressive theocracy.

If those are the only choices (which they aren't), then I vote for "repressive theocracy".

260 posted on 12/16/2002 8:33:46 AM PST by B-Chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson