Skip to comments.
Waiting in the weeds: Bill O'Reilly warns media snipers preparing to denigrate Dubya's competence
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Thursday, November 22, 2001 Thanksgiving Day
| Bill O'Reilly
Posted on 11/21/2001 11:09:34 PM PST by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: JohnHuang2
We are praying daily for President Bush, and he shall not fail.
2
posted on
11/21/2001 11:19:59 PM PST
by
tessalu
To: JohnHuang2
Recently, Matt Drudge actually accused me of wanting to do a radio program to exploit Rush Limbaugh's deafness an erroneous charge so vitriolic it took my breath away. I knew it. Something just told me that he wouldn't do something like that.
3
posted on
11/22/2001 2:40:30 AM PST
by
Samizdat
To: JohnHuang2
This is the same foe that ambushed ... President Clinton throughout his tenure in office.I must have missed many an article during Clinton's administration. Oh sure, there were the Monica chronicles, but the mainstream basically ingnored campaign finance fiascos, selling of strategic secrets, and a host of underhanded dealings. Bill Clinton is and was a traitor to America.
4
posted on
11/22/2001 2:53:24 AM PST
by
Quilla
To: JohnHuang2
.... A once-invincible president was battered and pilloried as a man who didn't know the price of milk a man who didn't care about the regular folks.....
Seems I recall something Bush 41 said about, "Read my lips....No new taxes!!" that cost him much more of his American support than not knowing the price of milk for supporting and signing into law the largest tax increase in history at that time.
5
posted on
11/22/2001 3:27:01 AM PST
by
Ron H.
To: Ron H.
Bush 41 made a much bigger mistake than "Read my lips..." in that he believed the Democrats would cut spending just because they promised. They got their tax increase and left him hanging out to dry.
Never, ever, ever believe a lyin' Democrat!
6
posted on
11/22/2001 3:37:20 AM PST
by
lonestar
To: JohnHuang2
Excellent post! Hopefully most Americans will see that we finally have a smart, couragous and moral leader. President Bush amazes me daily with his ability to work well with the Democratic & Republican party and the leaders of other countries. "If" Russia and the U.S. remain allies then President Bush will always be a legacy in my eyes! It's a breath of fresh air to see our president's eyes sparkle when he looks at his wife and children and believes in the power of prayer to lead our country.
7
posted on
11/22/2001 3:44:30 AM PST
by
4wvueers
To: Quilla
Exactly. The only reason Klinton had eight years to do to the nation what he did to Juanita Broadderick in 1978 is that the mainstream media purposefully ignored the really important stuff and focused on Lewinski. Lull the sheeple asleep with meaningless BS, and pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
8
posted on
11/22/2001 3:56:31 AM PST
by
wku man
To: 4wvueers; Quila
It's a breath of fresh air to see our president's eyes sparkle when he looks at his wife and children and believes in the power of prayer to lead our country. The only reason Klinton had eight years to do to the nation what he did to Juanita Broadderick in 1978 is that the mainstream media purposefully ignored the really important stuff and focused on Lewinski. Lull the sheeple asleep with meaningless BS . . .
I completely agree with both of you. There is hope, though, that the sheeple are waking up Quila. Lots of people have been praying like never before. And, I understand recently, people are turning media personalities in to the FBI, asking if certain statements they are making against the Administration/Bush is treasonous, etc. Maybe they're finally questioning what they are hearing (using their own brains to think?)
9
posted on
11/22/2001 4:04:44 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: nicmarlo
And, I understand recently, people are turning media personalities in to the FBI, asking if certain statements they are making against the Administration/Bush is treasonous, etc. THIS IS A GREAT IDEA!!! Where have you heard this?
10
posted on
11/22/2001 4:09:01 AM PST
by
Elkiejg
To: Elkiejg
turning media personalities in to the FBI, Let me find it. It was mentioned on another thread.
11
posted on
11/22/2001 4:12:08 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: JohnHuang2
So who goes with bloodlust after the "successful" media types?
12
posted on
11/22/2001 4:14:50 AM PST
by
Fraulein
To: Elkiejg
13
posted on
11/22/2001 4:15:00 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: nicmarlo
thanks for the link - I missed that thread. I personally thing reporting irresponsible media reporters to the FBI or Homeland Security is a wonderful idea. It's about time "middle America" takes back our country.
14
posted on
11/22/2001 4:20:07 AM PST
by
Elkiejg
To: lonestar
Never, ever, ever believe a lyin' Democrat!
Isn't that a bit redundant?
15
posted on
11/22/2001 4:23:09 AM PST
by
Aeronaut
To: Elkiejg
Your welcome and I agree. It wasn't something I had ever thought of, but, why not? If they all get reported, one time or two times the media may have gone too far and be charged. It would at least make them think twice (besides the fact that they know the public is p.o.'d at 'em, which, of course, means greater ratings drops).
16
posted on
11/22/2001 4:23:54 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: nicmarlo
And, I understand recently, people are turning media personalities in to the FBI....Really? That's fabulous. Yet I'm afraid that the majority of sheeple still get the 'facts' from dolts like Jennings and Rather. When I read accounts of their opinion-enhanced newscasts, I am stunned that people actually buy into this propaganda.
God bless America and President George W. Bush.
17
posted on
11/22/2001 4:26:40 AM PST
by
Quilla
To: Quilla
I'm afraid that the majority of sheeple still get the 'facts' from dolts like Jennings and Rather This is probably true, but it did me good to read about the guy in Texas who told Jennings "no one likes you" and it was aired, live. That was terrific!
18
posted on
11/22/2001 4:33:45 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: Aeronaut
Yep.
19
posted on
11/22/2001 6:14:49 AM PST
by
lonestar
To: nicmarlo
And, I understand recently, people are turning media personalities in to the FBI, asking if certain statements they are making against the Administration/Bush is treasonous, etc And you think an editor, for example, slamming Bush and/or the administration and being charged with treason is compatible with the Constitution in what particular way?
Geez. The terrorists must have gotten to the water supply with a ton of acid or something.
20
posted on
11/22/2001 6:27:20 AM PST
by
Cachelot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson