Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
In a nutshell, I think that property is based on initiated force only when civilizations clash. Inside a given civilization property is based on defensive force and free exchange of rights.

My guess would be the same as yours, that the Founding Fathers were keenly aware of the cultural foundation of property, -- they had to be, given the Indian tribes and the slavery.

23 posted on 12/03/2001 6:46:02 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
In a nutshell, I think that property is based on initiated force only when civilizations clash. Inside a given civilization property is based on defensive force and free exchange of rights.

Unless that civilization happens to be Marxist :-)

Don't mind my musings. It helps me to think (I think). You could just as correctly say when governments clash, right? As was the case in the Cold War. Not exactly two "civilizations", but merely two governments. As Patrick Henry (the freeper) said, property is a concept, therefore, it exists through law, which is an instrument of government, yes?

So, in summation, property is not a natural right, as is, say, self-defense. Right?

26 posted on 12/03/2001 7:02:51 AM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson