First, the LA Times is a proven liberal-leftwing propaganda sheet with little more credibility than the average supermarket tabloid. I didn't bother to read this, I assume its their usual distorted, incomplete and twisted BS. But let's indulge their fantasy for a moment and assume whatever line of crap their floating is true. Don't they remember, the President is above the law? Three years ago, all agreed. Corrupt Democrats. Republican cowards. A compliant media and an apathetic public. Why the sudden interest in corruption?
"First, the LA Times is a proven liberal-leftwing propaganda sheet with little more credibility than the average supermarket tabloid. I didn't bother to read this, I assume its their usual distorted, incomplete and twisted BS."
That you don't "waste your time reading" is obvious. It would be of benefit to you, before you reply on a thread, to at least skim through the posted article. It'll keep you from being Totally uniformed.
Here's the cheat sheet on this one for you ---
This article is not the LATimes condensed version where references to Clinton are avoided. This is by the original author.
There's this section that you could read if references to Bush and Mob offend your Sensitivities ---"Enron Rigs Washington During the Clinton Years".
Go ahead and read just that portion, then you'll be ready for another portion in a month or two.