[Inspector Harry Callahan]

The only real problem I have with this editorial is the political viewpoint of the author. He seems to WANT federal intervention into a private business (like price controls). I stand firmly against federal intervention in any kind of private corporation. I approach the issue from a Randian viewpoint.

But no matter how one views federal intervention, we should still be connecting these sleazy political dots and second-guessing EVERYONE's political motivations.

That said, I still enjoyed the article. Investigative journalism was missing during the Clinton years. Glad to see it coming back.

[San Jacinto]

Investigative journalism was missing during the Clinton years. Glad to see it coming back.

I understand there is a problem with "homelessness" in the country now that a Republican is back in the White House. I bet those "investigative journalists" get right on it.

[rdavis84]

"The only real problem I have with this editorial is the political viewpoint of the author. He seems to WANT federal intervention into a private business (like price controls). I stand firmly against federal intervention in any kind of private corporation. I approach the issue from a Randian viewpoint."

Agreed 100%. It's interesting to observe the current crop and some older crop put their best efforts at Transferring any given article Author's views to the poster of that article. My personal stand is and always HAS been that there is too much government, that they dance to too many special interest puppetmasters, and they no longer have ANY concept of the Constitution.

I'm crushed.

But I'll get over it.