Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
Rail is an excellent means of transporting large quantities of non-time-critical freight.

But UPS and FedEx are demanding trains that are time-critical, but not necessarily in need of overnight movement. UPS and the CSX have worked on a deal, and FedEx wants an arrangement similar to the "hot freight" of fifty years ago. They want to own the train and pay the BNSF or the CSX to provide a locomotive, cab crew and dispatching services.

The UP has an arrangement with the CSX to move fresh fruit and vegetables from California to Brooklyn on a very tight schedule with only a crew change, rather than a locomotive change, at Chicago.

The railroads are getting back into the business of moving time-sensitive materials on fixed schedules. Now if you put a coach or a few sleepers on the end of that train, you have a "hot freight" carrying people. This may be how things end up.

72 posted on 12/19/2001 8:14:50 AM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Publius
Interesting info about the time-sensitive freight movement.

A while back I learned that in many areas of freight movement the speed of a delivery is less important than the reliability. In other words, many customers would rather receive a delivery in twelve days on the dot than seven days with the possibility that it might be six or eight.

76 posted on 01/04/2002 5:03:51 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson