[cicero's_son]

I've got an idea: why don't you learn to read?

From my post #147 above: "Cars and roads are not good or evil. Neither are trains."

From yours #178: "Keep that in mind when trying to blame all of the evils of the world on the car."

Was I not clear enough when I said that "cars...are not evil" that I don't, in fact, blame all of the evils of the world on the car?

The fact that you explode in a rage over an innocuous post about what most people would consider a fairly unemotional topic only proves your fanaticism. Get a grip.

[discostu]

That's not exploding into rage. I was raised by Marines and outlaw bikers, if I ever explode in rage JimRob will yank my priviledges faster than the electrons can cool. I was irritated because you keep shifting the arguement around. I say trains can't beat the convenience of cars you say walking achieves everything I pointed out, I say walking sucks and you say cars are destroying small towns, I say they're not and you say I'm a car lover that just won't listen. That's pretty irritating. Try actually rebutting an arguement instead of piling on obfuscations.

And I stick by my judgement that you feel cars are the root of all evil, that doesn't make them evil themselves, inanimate object are only evil in bad horror movies we all know that, but you're constant harangueing against them shows that you certainly think there are a host of problems in the world that wouldn't be here without the car. While this is certainly true they aren't the problems you're complaining about.