You really want it in detail? OK, here goes...
You had claimed that mutation & natural selection could not generate an increase in information. I pointed to peptide & RNA growth on mineral surfaces, which you ridiculed, and then I backed up with a cite, which you ignored.
Fine. Ignoring the other person in a debate is standard face-saving procedure when you're losing an argument. But the pattern continued in the same post, when I also cited Miller's description of Doolittle's proof that vertebrate blood clotting evolved from simpler forms via gene duplication & other mutations. Which you likewise riduculed, along with claiming I didn't know what I was talking about, which prodded me into showing you in excruciating detail that you had no appreciation for how badly Behe actually performed in his debate with Miller. Which you also ignored.
Your complete arsenal in that exchange consisted of ad-hominems against Kenneth Miller & myself. My arsenal consisted of peer-reviewed studies, books, & web-published papers. I guess you're right, we never did actually debate blood clotting, as there never was an actual exchange of ideas. Point conceded.
You seem to want to debate something that is totally off the subject of the thread. Again, for any honest person, they can click the link you gave where you prattle on about Behe, click the "to" link to jump back, and follow the discussion back. It will quickly become evident to anyone and everyone that you completely changed the subject from what I had been talking about, to Ken Miller and Behe's argument. Jenny, you're pathetic, and debating you makes me feel really sorry for you. Just give it a rest, because I don't think anyone here really cares.
LOL! OK, OK, I'll let it be! But my point in bringing the whole thing up is to try to get you to defend your threads instead of simply flitting over to post several brand new ones. You want to change people's minds on FR? Then engage those who critique the articles you post! I know I've put you on the spot, & you're obviously in a very defensive mood, so I'll just suggest that you consider that & stick around next time you post some article that you think is going to shame the other side into submission. We've all had to defend the articles we post. Sometimes we even fail. But defending the articles you post builds character. Nobody here respects a hit-&-run thread poster.