Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal Immigrants
New York Times ^

Posted on 01/09/2002 5:00:20 PM PST by RCW2001



January 9, 2002

White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal Immigrants

By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 — The Bush administration proposed today to restore food stamps to legal immigrants, whose eligibility for benefits was severely restricted by the 1996 welfare law.

The White House said that in the budget President Bush will send to Congress in early February, at least 363,000 people would qualify for food stamps under a proposal that would cost the federal government $2.1 billion over 10 years.

The proposal, or something like it, has an excellent chance of becoming law. The Senate is considering such changes as part of a far-reaching bill to reauthorize farm and nutrition programs.

The welfare bill passed by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 made immigrants ineligible for food stamps and many other forms of assistance financed with federal money. Supporters of the ban, most of them Republicans, argued that federal benefits drew immigrants to the United States and then discouraged their work effort after they got here.

But today, with the country in a recession that is hurting immigrants, and fighting a war on terrorism that has targeted some immigrants, Mr. Bush is looking for ways to show his commitment to them as well as to addressing domestic problems — a transition his father failed to make effectively a decade ago after the Persian Gulf war. Moreover, many of those who would benefit from the food stamps are Hispanic Americans, whom the White House is ardently courting.

As Mr. Clinton did as well, President Bush is selectively disclosing parts of his budget in advance — specifically, those proposals likely to win political support for the president.

Antihunger groups and Hispanic groups were enthusiastic about Mr. Bush's proposal, without suggesting any ulterior motive.

"This is an enormous step forward, for which the president should be congratulated," said Cecilia Munoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino civil rights group. "Mr. Bush did not speak out on this in the presidential campaign, and he had not done so since he assumed office."

As governor of Texas and as president, Mr. Bush has taken pride in his good relations with Hispanic Americans, although the Republican Party is split on how aggressively to go after Hispanic voters.

Some Republicans have alienated Hispanic voters with proposals for a restrictionist immigration policy. But Karl Rove, the president's senior political adviser, said earlier this year that capturing a bigger share of Hispanic voters was "our mission and our goal" and would require assiduous work by "all of us in every way."

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, the federal government has detained more than 1,100 noncitizens for questioning and has stepped up enforcement of the immigration laws. Mr. Bush has insisted that he is waging war on terrorists, not immigrants, and his food stamp proposal can be cited to support that claim.

James D. Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, an antihunger group, said: "It's really positive that the administration wants to extend food stamp benefits to this group of legal immigrants. We are delighted the administration is supporting this."

The economy is much worse now than in 1996, when Mr. Clinton signed the welfare bill. "Immigrants have been hit hard by the economic downturn," Ms. Munoz said, "and there's no safety net for those who arrived after 1996."

Welfare and food stamp rolls have plummeted since 1996, and members of Congress express much less concern now about being overwhelmed with the programs' cost, even though budget surpluses have evaporated and Mr. Bush has emphasized holding down costs. Also, advocates for immigrants have made some progress on Capitol Hill by appealing to the American sense of justice.

"This will restore justice to people who work hard, pay taxes and play an incredibly important role in our economy," Ms. Munoz said. "It is unreasonable for somebody who works hard and is laid off to have no access to food for his family."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-265 next last

1 posted on 01/09/2002 5:00:20 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Another pitch for the Latino vote. Que lo pase bien Sr. Bush.
2 posted on 01/09/2002 5:13:45 PM PST by codeword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: codeword
They will never vote for him. Immigrants vote Dem.
4 posted on 01/09/2002 5:30:59 PM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
If they're here legally what's the problem? If they're here illegally, they should be deported (and shouldn't qualify for any welfare programs or other state aid in the interim).
5 posted on 01/09/2002 5:32:40 PM PST by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
Ouch!

I understand that there are huge electoral rewards for this.

But it's still wrong.

6 posted on 01/09/2002 5:37:38 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
I understand that there are huge electoral rewards for this.

Are those the same "huge electoral rewards" that the GOP reaped when they selected moderate Bob Dole in 1996, and he then selected moderate Jack Kemp to "reach out"?

Becoming moderate is no way to win. As Rush says, given a choice between a pretend Democrat and a real Democrat, the real one will win every time.

What Bush needs to do (if this country has any hope of avoiding "irreconcilable differences" down the road) is to start convincing people that we need less government and more freedom. He is doing exactly the opposite, despite the lip service and the cheerleading that goes on here.

7 posted on 01/09/2002 5:44:57 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: codeword
Republicans handing out welfare? This can't be! I always thought that Republicans were for less welfare, and more jobs, and freedom. That must have been a different group of Republicans.
9 posted on 01/09/2002 5:49:18 PM PST by Resplendent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
Interesting point! Is Geroge W. Bush a conservative???? i always thought he was. Maybe is just a bad bad congress. I hope.
10 posted on 01/09/2002 5:51:22 PM PST by Resplendent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I'd rather see them go back to commodities instead of food stamps. That way we're sure the money is going for food and the farmers benefit too.
11 posted on 01/09/2002 5:53:01 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
This is more focused than that general moderatism.

These bucks go to a specific group, at an excellent time.

It's hard core politics with our money and I disapprove of it for that reason ( and the welfare dependency argument ), but I do think it will work.

12 posted on 01/09/2002 5:55:05 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: RCW2001
I posted this on a thread yesterday discussing Bush's "no child left behind" education bill he put together with the help of his friend Ted Kennedy.

This bill is an attempt to gain political favor for Bush and the Republicans by playing the politically correct "education card". Apparantly, they can only see political advantage in caveing on one part of their constituency after the other.

This is yet one more example. Here he is playing the politically correct "diversity card".

Thanks for the post.

Regards

14 posted on 01/09/2002 5:56:27 PM PST by The Irishman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crabcake
A resigned, dreary 'ping'....why doesn't this guy call himself Gray Bush?

It was predicted when he went into pander mode that he would simply end up pushing welfare for the migrantes just like the RATs. At which point - why call him a Republican?

Is it just me or are other people mad that American guys are 13,000 miles away getting shot up while the non-Americans live the good life here at home? Is that what they are over there risking their butts for?

15 posted on 01/09/2002 6:00:04 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
I thought Bush was a conservative, but as time goes by, I see fewer indications that support my beliefs. I don't know for certain what his ideology is now. What do you think?
16 posted on 01/09/2002 6:00:43 PM PST by Resplendent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001;Mercuria;SpookBrat;Crabcake;dennisw;sarcasm
Bump and ping!!
17 posted on 01/09/2002 6:02:07 PM PST by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Bush is just another big government politician who wants to use your tax money to buy votes. Republicans never seem to learn that they are not going to win a bidding war with the Democrats for giving away your money. Welfare beneficiaries and other Democrats are always going to opt for the real thing and conservatives will stay home leaving the playing field wide open to Democrats.
18 posted on 01/09/2002 6:02:24 PM PST by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
It's hard core politics with our money and I disapprove of it for that reason ( and the welfare dependency argument ), but I do think it will work.

It's THEFT with our money, and unconstitional at that.

It will only work until the demoncrats come along and offer 2X what Bush is stealing for them.

The strategy will fail, and as usual the "hard core conservatives" will get blamed for it. I've seen the game played too many times to believe otherwise.

19 posted on 01/09/2002 6:02:54 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson