Regardless of Aristotle, every test and measurement (both scientific and mathematical) indicates that the human mind is an extremely complicated but otherwise boring piece of finite state machinery. This isn't proof of course, but there hasn't been the contrary test result to show otherwise and tons that support that hypothesis going back half a century.
How would you recognize if this were an incorrect statement?
If this means what I think it means -- that the brain could theoretically be halted like a computer and it memory dumped for analysis -- I think you're wrong.
Everything about the brain suggests a lot of analog processing going on. Not to mention there has never been any demonstration that even the simplest information can be captured and decoded.
There has been a tremendous effort to replace damaged sensory inputs -- hearing for example -- with computerized prosthetics. The results so far indicate two things: we don't know how sound is converted into usable nerve impulses, and the brain is so adaptable that it can learn, with time and effort, to use crappy inputs.